% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@MISC{Emmerichs:1046957,
author = {Emmerichs, Tamara},
othercontributors = {Emberson, Lisa Dianne and Mao, Huiting and Koren, Gerbrand
and Mamun, Abdulla and Ran, Limei and Zhang, Leiming and
Huang, Min and Gerosa, Giacomo and Guaita, Pierluigi Renan
and Betancourt, Clara and Wong, Anthony Y. H.},
title = {{M}odel outputs from the study '{C}an atmospheric chemistry
deposition schemes reliably simulate stomatal ozone flux
across global land covers and climates?''},
publisher = {Zenodo},
reportid = {FZJ-2025-04025},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Over the past few decades, ozone risk assessments for
vegetation have evolved two methods based on stomatal O3
flux. However, substantial uncertainties remain in
accurately simulating these fluxes. In the study by
Emmerichs et al. ('Can atmospheric chemistry deposition
schemes reliably simulate stomatal ozone flux across global
land covers and climates?', Biogeosciences 2025)
investigate stomatal O3 fluxes across various land cover
types worldwide simulated by six established deposition
models. This dataset contains the main model output from
WebDO3SE (csv data per station) and simulated sunlit and
total stomatal conductance from the TEMIR, ZHANG, CMAQ and
MESSy models (xlsx data file).},
cin = {ICE-3},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-3-20101013},
pnm = {2111 - Air Quality (POF4-211)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2111},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)32},
doi = {10.5281/ZENODO.15812487},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1046957},
}