% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Angst:1047034,
author = {Angst, M. and Müller, Thomas},
title = {{C}oupled charge, orbital, and spin degrees of freedom in
geometricallyfrustrated {YF}e2{O}4},
reportid = {FZJ-2025-04085},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Rhombohedral rare earth ferrites RFe2O4 have a strong
tendency for coupled charge (Fe2+/3+) andspin order, despite
the strong geometrical frustration of the interactions [1].
For R=Lu or Yb correspondingsuperstructure reflections or
diffuse scattering appear at ( 1313 ℓ). However, the size
of Y3+is considerably larger, with calculations [2]
suggesting smaller in-plane propagation such as ( 1414
).Here, we focus on single-crystal x-ray diffraction
performed on highly stoichiometric single crystals[3] of
YFe2O4. Magnetization vs T indicates two subsequent highly
hysteretic magnetic transitions,separating a low-temperature
(LT), an intermediate (IT), and a high-temperature
(paramagnetic, HT)phase. XRD shows that these transitions
are structural as well. In the HT phase, diffuse
scatteringat ( 1313 ℓ) is similar to other rare earth
ferrites. However, cooling into the magnetic phases,
sharpsuperstructure reflections at different positions
appear, with propagation ( 272737 ) in IT and ( 141434 )
inLT. We refined the superstructure in both phases and
applied bond-valence-sum (BVS) analysis toprobe the charge
order [4].In the LT phase, the structure is refined in P-1,
with the inversion center between the two Fe layers.The BVS
indicates a full charge order, with two of the Fe sites
having valence close to 2+ and theother two close to 3+.
Although of ( 1414 )-type, the arrangement of the valences
differs from the predictionin [2]. Structural distortions
also suggest (ferro) orbital order of the Fe2+ sites.The IT
phase is also refined in P1. A clear splitting of one Y
indicates the presence of disorder,which is likely connected
to a fragile nature of this phase, which was not
theoretically predicted. Ofthe 7 Fe sites, BVS shows 3 to
have valences very close to 2+, indicating a strong
localization of 3electrons on these sites. However, the BVS
of one of the sites is about 2.5, and for the remainingsites
also further away from the ideal 3 (BVS~2.8). Thus the
localization of electrons in the IT phaseis incomplete, and
it must be a dynamic situation with electron hopping
occurring.[1] M. Angst, Physica Status Solidi RRL, 7, 383
(2013).[2] M. Naka, A. Nagano, and S. Ishihara, Phys. Rev.
B, 77, 224441 (2008).[3] Th. Mueller, J. de Groot, J.
Strempfer, and M. Angst, J. Crystal Growth, 428, 40
(2015).[4] Th. Mueller and M. Angst, submitted to PRB.},
month = {Oct},
date = {2025-10-07},
organization = {JCNS Workshop 2025, Trends and
Perspectives in Neutron Scattering.
Quantum Materials: Theory and
Experiments, Evangelische Akademie
Tutzing (Germany), 7 Oct 2025 - 9 Oct
2025},
subtyp = {Invited},
cin = {JCNS-2 / JARA-FIT / JCNS-4},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)JCNS-2-20110106 / $I:(DE-82)080009_20140620$ /
I:(DE-Juel1)JCNS-4-20201012},
pnm = {632 - Materials – Quantum, Complex and Functional
Materials (POF4-632) / 6G4 - Jülich Centre for Neutron
Research (JCNS) (FZJ) (POF4-6G4)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-632 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-6G4},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)6},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1047034},
}