% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Ternes:1047252,
      author       = {Ternes, Simon and Brabec, Christoph J. and Castriotta,
                      Luigi A. and Exlager, Thomas and Forberich, Karen and
                      Gagliardi, Alessio and Götte, Michael and Mathies, Florian
                      and Ratnasingham, Sinclair Ryley and Reb, Lennart K. and
                      Unger, Eva and Di Carlo, Aldo},
      title        = {{P}rocess {P}arameter {S}pecification and {C}ontrol in
                      {S}olution {P}rocessing of {H}ybrid {P}erovskite
                      {P}hotovoltaics: {F}rom {D}omain‐{S}pecific {J}argon to
                      {E}vidence‐{B}ased, {U}nambiguous {D}escription of
                      {E}xperimental {W}orkflows},
      journal      = {Advanced energy materials},
      issn         = {1614-6832},
      address      = {Weinheim},
      publisher    = {Wiley-VCH},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2025-04183},
      pages        = {e03187},
      year         = {2025},
      abstract     = {Within the last 20 years, hybrid perovskite solar cells
                      (PSCs) have reached remarkable power conversion
                      efficiencies. Further, scalability of hybrid perovskite
                      deposition routines and stability of PSCs have been
                      significantly improved. Yet, a critical roadblock remains:
                      Poor reproducibility largely caused by inconsistent control
                      and reporting of process parameters. Key aspects such as the
                      handling of the perovskite solution, the air jet used for
                      drying, or the process atmosphere are often incompletely
                      specified. In response, this review systematically presents
                      the empirical evidence linking process parameters to the
                      film morphology and the device performance for
                      solution-based one-step and two-step deposition routines of
                      highly efficient PSCs as well as large-area perovskite
                      modules. To maximize interdisciplinary understanding, the
                      process parameters are standardized within the thin-film
                      solar cell ontology (TFSCO), structured according to the
                      internal logic of sequential deposition and classified by
                      fundamental mass transfer mechanisms. In a final literature
                      study, the state-of-the-art of parameter reporting is
                      assessed—mirroring to the community where reporting
                      standards can be improved. By using the here-presented
                      parameter list as a template, perovskite workflows become
                      fully and unambiguously specified—bridging the gap between
                      manual and automated process optimization and fostering
                      data-driven acceleration via digital twins of perovskite
                      research.},
      cin          = {IET-2 / IMD-3},
      ddc          = {050},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IET-2-20140314 / I:(DE-Juel1)IMD-3-20101013},
      pnm          = {1214 - Modules, stability, performance and specific
                      applications (POF4-121) / 1212 - Materials and Interfaces
                      (POF4-121)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1214 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1212},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)36 / PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      doi          = {10.1002/aenm.202503187},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1047252},
}