001048699 001__ 1048699
001048699 005__ 20251201202159.0
001048699 0247_ $$2datacite_doi$$a10.34734/FZJ-2025-04821
001048699 037__ $$aFZJ-2025-04821
001048699 1001_ $$aLanger, Raymond$$b0
001048699 1112_ $$aTag der Forschungsdaten in NRW 2025$$cRWTH Aachen$$d2025-11-18 - 2025-11-18$$wGermany
001048699 245__ $$aExperience report: Developing and implementing a research datamanagement strategy and policy at the Institute for Combustion Technology
001048699 260__ $$c2025
001048699 3367_ $$033$$2EndNote$$aConference Paper
001048699 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOther
001048699 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aINPROCEEDINGS
001048699 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aLECTURE_SPEECH
001048699 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)31$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aTalk (non-conference)$$btalk$$mtalk$$s1764588403_5139
001048699 3367_ $$2DINI$$aOther
001048699 500__ $$aThis work is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy – Cluster of Excellence 2186 “The Fuel Science Center” – ID: 390919832.
001048699 520__ $$aFrom FAIR principles to practice, we present an experience report on designing and implementing an institute-wide research data management strategy and policy at the Institute for Combustion Technology, RWTH Aachen University. With about 25 PhD students and postdocs across simulations, experiments, and modeling, we initially lacked a unified process amid the use of diverse tools and various individual solutions. The decision to create an institute-wide policy emerged as we moved to use the Collaborative Scientific Integration Environment (Coscine) for the management and storage of research data and to integrate it with existing processes and IT infrastructure, which raised complex data management questions. The policy provides clear governance through three pillars: project-level data management plans in the Research Data Management Organiser (RDMO), git-based management of software and other text-based assets in the RWTH GitLab, and storage, referencing, and documentation of all research data in Coscine. It grew from broad discussions on processes, infrastructure, and domain knowledge. A small team of group leaders, data stewards, and experienced PhD students prepared the draft and refined it with feedback from about 25 researchers. We share lessons learned: establishing institute-wide standards is time-consuming, but it enables sharing proven practices, clarifies and improves processes, and ensures long-term findability and accessibility. The strategy is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17748591
001048699 7001_ $$aFröde, Fabian$$b1
001048699 7001_ $$aCafiero, Marianna$$b2
001048699 7001_ $$aPitsch, Heinz$$b3
001048699 7870_ $$0FZJ-2025-04418$$1isPartof
001048699 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1048699/files/2025-11-18_Research_Data_Day_Langer_Experience_Report.pdf$$yOpenAccess
001048699 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1048699$$popenaire$$popen_access$$pdriver
001048699 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
001048699 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)10000$$2StatID$$aHosted Content
001048699 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
001048699 9801_ $$aUNRESTRICTED
001048699 9801_ $$aFullTexts
001048699 980__ $$atalk
001048699 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ZB-20090406