% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Schlegel:1048794,
author = {Schlegel, Ulrike and Kleven, Heidi and Gillespie, Tom and
Köhnen, Louisa and Gui, Xiaoyun and Gazzotti, Raphael and
Schmid, Oliver and Dickscheid, Timo and Amunts, Katrin and
Bjaalie, Jan G. and Leergaard, Trygve B. and Zehl, Lyuba},
title = {open{MINDS} {SANDS}: making brain atlases machine-
actionable using {L}inked {D}ata},
reportid = {FZJ-2025-04909},
year = {2025},
abstract = {<b>INTRODUCTION/MOTIVATION</b><br>Brain atlases underpin
many branches of neuroscience by providing a spatial
scaffold on whichmultimodal data can be organised and
compared. Yet atlas resources are often released as
projectspecific archives differing in structure, coordinate
space, parcellation logic, and nomenclature.
Thisheterogeneity forces developers to write custom loaders,
hinders cross-atlas comparison, andpropagates inconsistency.
To overcome these barriers we introduced openMINDS
$SANDS(RRID:SCR_023498),$ a Linked Data specification that
operationalises the Atlas Ontology Model(AtOM) [1] within
the openMINDS metadata framework $(RRID:SCR_023173).$ Our
goal is to turnstatic atlas downloads into interoperable web
resources that can be queried and reused by humansand
machines alike.<br><br><b>METHODS</b><br>SANDS was
implemented as an openMINDS extension integrating the four
AtOM entities (referencedata, coordinate system,
annotations, terminology) into the holistic openMINDS model.
Schemaswere designed to follow the FAIR principles [2]
(e.g., licensing, links to other FAIR resources) and toadopt
AtOM suggestions (e.g., standardized atlas structures,
versioning). To demonstrate expressiveness, we curated
widely used brain atlases in accordance with SANDS for three
commonatlas types: (i) discrete atlases where the annotation
set contains only discretely defined regions,
(ii)probabilistic atlases where the annotation set contains
regions defined by statistically-weightedcomposites, and
(iii) parcellation models where processive annotation
criteria are defined to createspecimen-specific atlases by
parcellating a single specimen’s anatomy and mapping it to
a definedterminology. Finally, the SANDS compliant Linked
Data descriptions of the curated atlases wereshared
formatted as JSON-LD files through the openMINDS instance
libraries $(RRID:SCR_027358)making$ them serviceable to any
software and service developers as standardized
atlasrepresentations.<br><br><b>RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION</b><br>As of today (2025-08-28), we have applied
SANDS to 13 commonly used brain atlases andparcellation
models from 3 different species. Their Linked Data
representations are provided in theopenMINDS instances
libraries. As evidence, we present one example for each
atlas type: (i) theWaxholm Space Rat Brain Atlas
$(RRID:SCR_017124)$ [3] as example for a discrete atlas,
(ii) theJulich-Brain Atlas $(RRID:SCR_023277)$ [4] as
example for a probabilistic atlas, and (iii) the
DesikanKilliany Atlas [5] as example for a parcellation
model. These examples demonstrate harmonized atlasusage
between the EBRAINS Knowledge Graph $(RRID:SCR_017612;$
EBRAINS central data andknowledge platform), and the siibra
toolsuite [6] (EBRAINS software for providing
interactivemultilevel brain atlases) enabled by adopting
SANDS.By integrating AtOM into the openMINDS metadata
framework, SANDS converts existing atlases intoFAIR,
machine-actionable web resources. The resulting Linked Data
facilitates side-by-sidevisualization, pipeline automation,
and atlas-driven analysis. Moreover, SANDS instances can
beharvested by search engines, enriched with community
annotations, and mirrored acrossrepositories. However, the
main limitation remains sociotechnical: atlas providers must
supplycompliant metadata, and developers must replace
hard-coded templates with dynamic queries. Toease adoption
we are developing open-source converters from other
standardization efforts such asBIDS [7] and provide
integration support through our GitHub (Open Metadata
Initiative). By makingbrain atlases first-class Linked-Data
citizens, openMINDS SANDS removes the final technical
barrierto fully FAIR, automation-ready neuroanatomical
workflows.Keywords: Atlas Ontology Model (AtOM), discrete
brain atlas, FAIR principles, Linked Data,openMINDS SANDS,
parcellation model, probabilistic brain atlas, spatial
reference frameworks<br><br><b>ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS</b><br>This
work has received funding from the European Union’s
Horizon Europe research and innovationprogramme under grant
agreement No 101147319 (EBRAINS 2.0). It also was supported
by theHelmholtz International BigBrain Analytics and
Learning Laboratory
(HIBALL).<br><br><b>REFERENCES</b><ol><li>Kleven H,
Gillespie TH, Zehl L, et al. AtOM, an ontology model to
standardize use of brain atlases in tools, workflows, and
data infrastructures. Sci Data. 2023;10:486.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02389-4</li><li>Wilkinson
MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJJ, et al. The FAIR guiding
principles for scientific datamanagement and stewardship.
Sci Data. 2016;3:160018.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18</li><li>Kleven H,
Bjerke IE, Clascá F, et al. Waxholm Space atlas of the rat
brain: a 3D atlas supporting data analysis and integration.
Nat Methods. 2023;20:1822-1829.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-023-02034-3</li><li>Amunts K,
Mohlberg H, Bludau S, Zilles K. Julich-Brain: a 3D
probabilistic atlas of the human brain’s cytoarchitecture.
Science. 2020;369(6506):988-992.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb4588</li><li>Desikan RS,
Ségonne F, Fischl B, et al. An automated labeling system
for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into
gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage.
2006;31(3):968-980.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021</li><li>Dickscheid
T, Gui X, Simsek A, et al. Siibra: a software tool suite for
realizing a multilevel human brain atlas from complex data
resources. bioRxiv. Published online May 20, 2025.
https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.20.655042</li><li>Gorgolewski
KJ, Auer T, Calhoun VD, et al. The brain imaging data
structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of
neuroimaging experiments. Sci Data. 2016;3:160044.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44</li></ol>},
month = {Dec},
date = {2025-12-08},
organization = {EBRAINS summit 2025, Brüssel
(Belgium), 8 Dec 2025 - 11 Dec 2025},
subtyp = {After Call},
cin = {INM-1},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-1-20090406},
pnm = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
(POF4-525) / EBRAINS 2.0 - EBRAINS 2.0: A Research
Infrastructure to Advance Neuroscience and Brain Health
(101147319) / HIBALL - Helmholtz International BigBrain
Analytics and Learning Laboratory (HIBALL) (InterLabs-0015)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251 / G:(EU-Grant)101147319 /
G:(DE-HGF)InterLabs-0015},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)24},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1048794},
}