001     1049019
005     20251209202152.0
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2025-05114
100 1 _ |a Rathkopf, Charles
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)176538
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
111 2 _ |a Colloquium of the Department of Linguistics at the University of Tübingen
|d 2025-12-08 - 2025-12-08
|w Germany
245 _ _ |a Artificial Competence
260 _ _ |c 2025
336 7 _ |a Conference Paper
|0 33
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a Other
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a INPROCEEDINGS
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a LECTURE_SPEECH
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Talk (non-conference)
|b talk
|m talk
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)31
|s 1765287880_6389
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|x Invited
336 7 _ |a Other
|2 DINI
502 _ _ |c Tübingen
520 _ _ |a AI systems increasingly match or surpass humans on complex tasks, yet they often exhibit surprising failure modes or inconsistent behavior across evaluation contexts. While cognitive science relies on the distinction between competence and performance to explain similar discrepancies in humans, this distinction is often framed in terms that preclude its straightforward application to artificial neural networks. This paper develops a unified account of competence applicable to both biological and artificial systems, locating competence at the algorithmic level of analysis. On this view, a system is competent in a domain when it implements an algorithm that reliably generalizes across that domain. Importantly, the relevant notion of implementation applies to neural networks when formalized under causal abstraction: a neural network implements an algorithm if there exists a mapping between the network's components and the algorithm's variables such that both respond identically to causal interventions. This framework provides a principled way to distinguish competence from auxiliary factors that affect performance across systems with very different constraints and architectures. It thereby accounts for double dissociations between performance and competence in both humans and AI systems, and offers a template for designing competence-sensitive evaluation in cognitive science and AI.
536 _ _ |a 5255 - Neuroethics and Ethics of Information (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 0
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1049019
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)176538
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2025
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
|k INM-7
|l Gehirn & Verhalten
|x 0
980 _ _ |a talk
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21