% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Gall:1049622,
author = {Gall, Samuel Le and van Dusschoten, Dagmar and Lattacher,
Adrian and Giraud, Mona and Harings, Moritz and Deseano
Diaz, Paulina Alejandra and Pflugfelder, Daniel and Alahmad,
Samir and Hickey, Lee and Sircan, Ahmet and Kandler, Ellen
and Lobet, Guillaume and Schnepf, Andrea and Pagel, Holger
and Poll, Christian and Vereecken, Harry and Javaux, Mathieu
and Rothfuss, Youri},
title = {{C}ombining spring wheat genotypes with contrasting root
architectures for a better use of water resources in soil?
{E}vidence from column-scale water stable isotopic
experiments.},
journal = {Plant and soil},
reportid = {FZJ-2025-05410},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Background and AimsThe advantages of genotype mixtures on
soil water balance are still poorly understood. We aim to
determine the impact of soil water conditions (well-watered
or chronic water deficit) on the root water uptake (RWU) of
two contrasting root genotypes (“shallow root system”
SRS and “deep root system” DRS) and their mixture at the
booting stage.MethodsWe conducted a controlled plant-soil
column experiment and quantified daily vertical profiles of
the fraction of RWU (fRWU, $\%$ cm-1), i.e. the relative
contribution of RWU normalized by the thickness of each
layer. This calculation was achieved by applying Bayesian
modelling on non-destructive soil and transpiration water
stable isotopic measurements after pulse labelling. We
compared these results to the monitored plant soil water
status, plant physiology and root
architectures.ResultsNotwithstanding minor variations in
root distribution, the SRS genotype exhibited a greater fRWU
compared to the SRS genotype in the topsoil (3.87±1.05 and
3.49±1.05 $\%$ cm-1, respectively) and vice-versa for the
subsoil (resp. 1.16±0.17 and 1.53±0.41 $\%$ cm-1). In
mixture, both genotypes maintained individual complementary
fRWU distribution. The soil water deficit conditions
resulted in an average increase in relative water uptake
from the subsoil $(+0.5\%$ cm-1) and topsoil $(+0.29\%$
cm-1) for both genotypes. In mixture facing water deficit,
the two genotypes in the mixture increased their
contributions to the subsoil by $0.5\%$ cm-1 and decreased
those to the topsoil by $-1.2\%$ cm-1 in comparison to a
monoculture.ConclusionThis study introduces novel
observations of root water uptake plasticity, which is
determined by genotype root architectures, soil water
availability, and interactions with neighboring plant root
architectures. This study highlights the potential of
contrasting root architectures mixtures to improve their
water - and nutrient – access facing water deficit.},
cin = {IBG-3},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact
(POF4-217)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)25},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7411150/v1},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1049622},
}