% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Wgrzyski:1049923,
author = {Węgrzyński, Wojciech and Spodyniuk, Nadiia and Zimny,
Mateusz and Jahn, Wolfram and Vigne, Gabriele and Arnold,
Lukas},
title = {{S}urvey on the use of tenability criteria in {CFD}
analyses for {P}erformance-{B}ased {F}ire {S}afety
{E}ngineering},
journal = {Journal of physics / Conference Series},
volume = {3121},
number = {1},
issn = {1742-6588},
address = {Bristol},
publisher = {IOP Publ.},
reportid = {FZJ-2025-05677},
pages = {012045 -},
year = {2025},
abstract = {An online survey on the use of tenability criteria in CFD
analyses for PBFSE was conducted, to better understand the
current industry practices in fire modelling. 254
participants responded, representing wide range of roles in
professional practice. Visibility in smoke is the most used
$(90.2\%)$ and most influential $(91.4\%)$ tenability
criterion, while smoke temperatures are being commonly
evaluated $(76.5\%)$ but more rarely impact the design
$(45.8\%).$ Criteria related to smoke toxicity were used
only by $10.4\%$ - $19.9\%$ of participants, indicating
potential gaps in life safety assessments. The paper
presents more detailed results, as well as future research
directions informed by the outcomes.},
month = {Sep},
date = {2025-09-03},
organization = {5th European Symposium on Fire Safety
Science, Ljubljana (Slovenia), 3 Sep
2025 - 5 Sep 2025},
cin = {IAS-7},
ddc = {530},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-7-20180321},
pnm = {5111 - Domain-Specific Simulation $\&$ Data Life Cycle Labs
(SDLs) and Research Groups (POF4-511)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16 / PUB:(DE-HGF)8},
doi = {10.1088/1742-6596/3121/1/012045},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1049923},
}