% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Longp:1050134,
author = {Longépé, Nicolas and Alemohammad, Hamed and Anghelea,
Anca and Brunschwiler, Thomas and Camps-Valls, Gustau and
Cavallaro, Gabriele and Chanussot, Jocelyn and Delgado, Jose
Manuel and Demir, Begüm and Dionelis, Nikolaos and
Fraccaro, Paolo and Jungbluth, Anna and Kennedy, Robert E.
and Marsocci, Valerio and Ramasubramanian, Muthukumaran and
Ramos-Pollan, Raul and Roy, Sujit and Sümbül, Gencer and
Tuia, Devis and Zhu, Xiao Xiang and Ramachandran, Rahul},
title = {{E}arth {A}ction in {T}ransition: {H}ighlights {F}rom the
2025 {ESA}–{NASA} {I}nternational {W}orkshop on {AI}
{F}oundation {M}odels for {EO} [{S}pace-{A}gencies]},
journal = {IEEE geoscience and remote sensing magazine},
volume = {13},
number = {4},
issn = {2473-2397},
address = {New York, NY},
publisher = {IEEE},
reportid = {FZJ-2025-05839},
pages = {457 - 462},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Over 850 people joined the first International Workshop on
AI Foundation Model (FM) for Earth Observation (EO)
co-organized by ESA and NASA 5-7 May 2025. Hosted at ESRIN
(ESA’s Earth Observation Center, Italy), the event
welcomed around 300 people on site, and an additional 550
online, with the promise that FMs can revolutionize EO and
Earth sciences. The workshop marked a pivotal moment in
aligning the EO and FM communities, fostering a shared
commitment to developing open and trustworthy tools that
support science discovery, operational applications, and
prescriptive analytics. EO data is massive, complex and high
dimensional requiring specific yet scalable AI
architectures. The workshop emphasized the need for training
and architecture enabling interpretability, explainability,
and physical consistency. Coordination should be
strengthened to minimize redundant development and to better
leverage collective expertise. The focus has shifted from
prototyping to real-world deployment, with FMs needing
further design for integration into digital twins,
dashboards, and edge platforms. Transparent benchmarking and
user-driven evaluation are key to guiding model development
and decision-making. In addition, parameter-efficient
adaptation, neural compression, and embedding-based
workflows offer promising paths for scaling EO analytics.
While FMs show promise, their effectiveness remains
context-dependent. The community debated whether to pursue
universal models, specialized solutions, or mixtures of
experts. The workshop envisioned the future of agentic AI in
EO, with multi-agent system powered by EO FMs and
vision-language models, that can dynamically reason and act
on EO data. This shift from static pipelines to adaptive,
smarter systems could redefine the future of EO. This paper
summarizes key discussions and concludes with
thought-provoking remarks.},
cin = {JSC},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406},
pnm = {5111 - Domain-Specific Simulation $\&$ Data Life Cycle Labs
(SDLs) and Research Groups (POF4-511)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
doi = {10.1109/MGRS.2025.3592035},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1050134},
}