Home > Publications database > Artifact detection in fluorescence microscopy using convolutional autoencoder > print

001     1050784
005     20260116204419.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1038/s41598-025-18943-6
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 10.34734/FZJ-2026-00508
|2 datacite_doi
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2026-00508
082 _ _ |a 600
100 1 _ |a Rehn, Fabian
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)190725
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Artifact detection in fluorescence microscopy using convolutional autoencoder
260 _ _ |a [London]
|c 2025
|b Springer Nature
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1768554734_10261
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a To ensure analytical accuracy in fluorescence microscopy image analysis, robust artifact detection is essential. For large datasets or time-sensitive analyses, automation is advisable, as it not only reduces time and costs but also eliminates human bias and enhances reproducibility. Although artificial intelligence is commonly employed for artifact detection, it is typically limited to recognizing artifact types that have been previously learned, often necessitating large training datasets. This study proposes an approach for an automated detection of previously unseen artifacts without the need for a training set of artifact-laden images. Multiple datasets were assembled using images generated by our surface-based intensity distribution analysis (sFIDA) technology during different experiments. A convolutional autoencoder was trained on a dataset of artifact-free images to reproduce preprocessed images accurately. Artifact-laden images are subsequently detected by computing the difference between the input and output of the model, with increased discrepancies indicating the presence of artifacts. The proposed model is capable of classifying artifacts across different datasets with an average accuracy of 95.5%. Additionally, the model was able to detect unseen artifacts of various types, including differences in cause, structure, size and intensity. The findings demonstrate that convolutional autoencoders provide a lightweight, but effective method for detecting artifact-laden images. While the method was tested only on sFIDA images, its design, which does not rely on an artifact specific training set, suggests potential for use across various microscopy techniques.
536 _ _ |a 5241 - Molecular Information Processing in Cellular Systems (POF4-524)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5241
|c POF4-524
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Pils, Marlene
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)171619
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Bujnicki, Tuyen
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)162212
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Bannach, Oliver
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)157832
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Willbold, Dieter
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)132029
|b 4
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1038/s41598-025-18943-6
|g Vol. 15, no. 1, p. 32482
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2615211-3
|n 1
|p 32482
|t Scientific reports
|v 15
|y 2025
|x 2045-2322
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1050784/files/s41598-025-18943-6.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1050784
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)190725
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)171619
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)162212
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)157832
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)132029
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-524
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Molecular and Cellular Information Processing
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5241
|x 0
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1040
|2 StatID
|b Zoological Record
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b SCI REP-UK : 2022
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2024-07-29T15:28:26Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2024-07-29T15:28:26Z
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2024-12-18
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2024-12-18
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBI-7-20200312
|k IBI-7
|l Strukturbiochemie
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBI-7-20200312
980 1 _ |a FullTexts

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21