Contribution to a book FZJ-2026-00911

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Optimal Decisions and Why Not to Ask AI for Them



2025
Springer Nature Switzerland

Optimal Decisions and Why Not to Ask AI for Them Switzerland : Springer Nature 29-46 ()

Abstract: Although we make decisions all the time in our own personal lives and as scientists, there is still a surprising amount of ambiguity about what constitutes an optimal decision. We recently started to improve or fully outsource some of our decision-making to AI technologies that are built to provide recommendations or decision-making support. In a society that relies more and more on such support systems, it is also remarkably unclear how optimal decision-making could be further boosted. Although AI outputs often successfully assist human decision-making processes, what has yet to find sufficient attention in the debate is an encompassing understanding of the conditions for optimal decision-making with and without AI. This chapter (i) critically investigates the understanding of and overall pursuit to make optimal decisions, and (ii) describes the discrepancy between human practice of decision-making and the so-called AI decision-making processes. The concept of decision-making is connected to concepts of agency and thus part of a normative framework. One result of this investigation is that while AI can provide some calculative assistance to find a defined optimum, it cannot make optimal decisions.T


Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Gehirn & Verhalten (INM-7)
Research Program(s):
  1. 5255 - Neuroethics and Ethics of Information (POF4-525) (POF4-525)

Appears in the scientific report 2025
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Books > Contribution to a book
Institute Collections > INM > INM-7
Workflow collections > Public records
Publications database

 Record created 2026-01-22, last modified 2026-02-20



Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)