001     1052352
005     20260123203315.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1007/s00415-025-13573-4
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0367-004X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0012-1037
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0340-5354
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1432-1459
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 10.34734/FZJ-2026-00954
|2 datacite_doi
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2026-00954
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Konitsioti, Agni M.
|0 0000-0002-7296-4349
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Serum neurofilament light chain as a biomarker of disease control in multiple sclerosis: a real-world cross-sectional analysis of therapeutic regimens
260 _ _ |a [Darmstadt]
|c 2026
|b Steinkopff
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1769162857_19119
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a Funding: Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The study was supported by an unrestricted grant from Novartis.
520 _ _ |a BackgroundSerum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) is an established biomarker of disease activity and progression in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), with studies showing elevated sNfL levels during relapses and positive associations with disability scores.Objective To assess sNfL levels in PwMS receiving different disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), with a particular focus on extended-interval dosing (EID) regimens in real-world clinical practice.MethodsIn this two-center cross-sectional study, 172 PwMS without relapses in the preceding three months were included (University Hospital Cologne, n = 125; University Hospital Mainz, n = 47). Patients were categorized into the following groups: (1) low-efficacy DMT (leDMT; n = 8), (2) natalizumab standard-interval dosing (SID; every 4 weeks; n = 7), (3) natalizumab EID (every 6–8 weeks; n = 53), (4) ofatumumab (n = 17), (5) ocrelizumab SID (every 6 months; n = 48), (6) ocrelizumab EID (every 9 months; n = 17), and (7) no DMT (n = 19). sNfL levels were measured once in a cross-sectional design using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay.Results No significant differences in sNfL levels were observed across DMT subgroups in the ANCOVA analysis after adjusting for age and the presence of new T2 lesions on the most recent cranial MRI. However, PwMS receiving DMTs showed lower sNfL levels compared with untreated patients. Notably EID of ocrelizumab (every 9 months; 1.56 pg/mL, 95% CI 1.26–1.85) and natalizumab (every 8 weeks; 1.46 pg/mL, 95% CI 1.29–1.64) was not associated with higher sNfL levels compared to standard interval dosing (SID) of ocrelizumab (1.45 pg/mL, 95% CI 1.27–1.63) or natalizumab (1.13 pg/mL, 95% CI 0.68–1.58).Conclusion EID regimens were not associated with increased sNfL levels, suggesting that they may effectively limit neuroaxonal damage. Larger studies that assess the added value sNfL monitoring for safely personalizing treatment intervals in PwMS with initially active disease are needed.
536 _ _ |a 5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability (POF4-525)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251
|c POF4-525
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Schweitzer, Finja
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Johannis, Wibke
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Steffen, Falk
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Bittner, Stefan
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Fink, Gereon R.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
|b 5
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Schroeter, Michael
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Warnke, Clemens
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
773 _ _ |a 10.1007/s00415-025-13573-4
|g Vol. 273, no. 1, p. 34
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1421299-7
|n 1
|p 34
|t Journal of neurology
|v 273
|y 2026
|x 0367-004X
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1052352/files/PDF.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1052352
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2026
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2024-12-10
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2024-12-10
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2024-12-10
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2024-12-10
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2024-12-10
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J NEUROL : 2022
|d 2024-12-10
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
|d 2024-12-10
915 _ _ |a DEAL Springer
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3002
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-10
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2024-12-10
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2024-12-10
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2024-12-10
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b J NEUROL : 2022
|d 2024-12-10
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2024-12-10
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-10
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2024-12-10
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
|k INM-3
|l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21