001053031 001__ 1053031
001053031 005__ 20260220104127.0
001053031 037__ $$aFZJ-2026-01373
001053031 041__ $$aEnglish
001053031 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)201475$$aSchäfer, Christian$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
001053031 1112_ $$aDPG-Herbsttagung: 100 Jahre Quantenmechanik$$cGöttingen$$d2025-09-08 - 2025-09-12$$wGermany
001053031 245__ $$aJosephson vortex pinning in two-dimensional SNS-arrays
001053031 260__ $$c2025
001053031 3367_ $$033$$2EndNote$$aConference Paper
001053031 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOther
001053031 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aINPROCEEDINGS
001053031 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aconferenceObject
001053031 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aLECTURE_SPEECH
001053031 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)6$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aConference Presentation$$bconf$$mconf$$s1770031792_2132$$xAfter Call
001053031 520__ $$aWe fabricated Josephson arrays by etching stacked platinum-niobium (Pt-Nb) thin films. By analyzing both small (3×3) and large (30×30 and 50×50) arrays, we examined how array size and edge effects affect the frustration patterns created by the flow of Josephson vortices. Upon cooling the arrays below 300 mK, the energy barrier for vortex motion increases, immobilizing the vortices and causing the array's behavior to resemble that of a single reference junction. In this vortex-pinned regime, we studied the switching dynamics of the arrays. To determine the distribution of single-junction critical currents within the array, we compared our experimental findings with simulations based on the resistively and capacitively shunted junction (RCSJ) model.
001053031 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5222$$a5222 - Exploratory Qubits (POF4-522)$$cPOF4-522$$fPOF IV$$x0
001053031 536__ $$0G:(GEPRIS)390534769$$aDFG project G:(GEPRIS)390534769 - EXC 2004: Materie und Licht für Quanteninformation (ML4Q) (390534769)$$c390534769$$x1
001053031 65027 $$0V:(DE-MLZ)SciArea-120$$2V:(DE-HGF)$$aCondensed Matter Physics$$x0
001053031 65017 $$0V:(DE-MLZ)GC-120-2016$$2V:(DE-HGF)$$aInformation and Communication$$x0
001053031 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)190635$$aTeller, Justus$$b1$$ufzj
001053031 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)161192$$aBennemann, Benjamin$$b2$$ufzj
001053031 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)180691$$aLyatti, Matvey$$b3$$ufzj
001053031 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)130795$$aLentz, Florian$$b4$$ufzj
001053031 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)125588$$aGrützmacher, Detlev$$b5$$ufzj
001053031 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)128634$$aSchäpers, Thomas$$b6$$ufzj
001053031 8564_ $$uhttps://quantum25.dpg-tagungen.de/
001053031 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1053031$$pVDB
001053031 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)201475$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
001053031 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)190635$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
001053031 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)161192$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
001053031 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)180691$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
001053031 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)130795$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
001053031 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)125588$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b5$$kFZJ
001053031 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)128634$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b6$$kFZJ
001053031 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-522$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5222$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vQuantum Computing$$x0
001053031 9141_ $$y2025
001053031 920__ $$lyes
001053031 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)PGI-9-20110106$$kPGI-9$$lHalbleiter-Nanoelektronik$$x0
001053031 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)PGI-10-20170113$$kPGI-10$$lJARA Institut Green IT$$x1
001053031 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)HNF-20170116$$kHNF$$lHelmholtz - Nanofacility$$x2
001053031 980__ $$aconf
001053031 980__ $$aVDB
001053031 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)PGI-9-20110106
001053031 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)PGI-10-20170113
001053031 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)HNF-20170116
001053031 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED