% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Mair:1053910,
author = {Mair, Maximilian J and Lohmann, Philipp and Galldiks,
Norbert and Belting, Mattias and Brandal, Petter and Broen,
Martinus P G and Cicone, Francesco and Daisne,
Jean-François and Ducray, François and Ehret, Felix and
Furtner, Julia and Jakola, Asgeir S and Niyazi, Maximilian
and Pellerino, Alessia and Rasschaert, Marika and Razis,
Evangelia and Sahm, Felix and Smits, Marion and Tolboom,
Nelleke and Verger, Antoine and Le Rhun, Emilie and Minniti,
Giuseppe and Weller, Michael and Preusser, Matthias and
Albert, Nathalie L},
title = {{IMG}-82. {P}ositron emission tomography ({PET}) use among
{E}uropean {O}rganisation for {R}esearch and {T}reatment of
{C}ancer – {B}rain {T}umour {G}roup ({EORTC}-{BTG}) sites
– a cross-sectional survey},
issn = {1523-5866},
reportid = {FZJ-2026-01608},
year = {2025},
abstract = {AbstractBACKGROUNDPositron emission tomography (PET) is
increasingly used in patients with brain tumors, yet its
adoption varies across institutions.METHODSTo assess the
current landscape, a cross-sectional survey was conducted
among European Organization for Research and Treatment of
Cancer (EORTC) – Brain Tumour Group (BTG) sites between
June 2024 and August 2024.RESULTSOut of the 312 sites
invited, 103 replies from 20 countries in the Europe/Middle
East region were received. PET availability was reported by
96/103 $(93.2\%)$ sites, of whom 74 reported PET use in
patients with brain tumors. Most frequently, PET was
performed in glioma (69/74, $93.2\%),$ followed by brain
metastasis (58/74, $78.4\%),$ meningioma (52/74, $70.3\%),$
and CNS lymphoma (46/74, $62.2\%).$ Amino acid PET was used
at 62/71 centers $(87.3\%),$ mainly in glioma (58/59,
$98.3\%)$ and for differentiation of tumor progression from
treatment-related changes (58/59, $98.3\%),$ differential
diagnosis (54/59, $91.5\%),$ and hotspot delineation (47/59,
$79.7\%).$ Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) PET was performed at
50/68 sites $(73.5\%),$ predominantly in meningioma (48/49,
$98.0\%),$ and for patient selection before radioligand
therapy (41/49, $83.7\%)$ as well as for target volume
definition in radiotherapy (33/49, $67.3\%)$ and
differential diagnosis (27/49, $55.1\%).$ PET was covered by
statutory health insurance at 46/59 $(78.0\%)$ centers for
amino acid PET and 33/49 $(67.3\%)$ for SSTR PET according
to self-reported information. Main reasons for not
performing PET in clinical routine included limited
availability of tracers (14/29, $48.3\%),$ high cost (11/29,
$37.9\%),$ and PET considered unnecessary by referring
physicians (8/29, $27.6\%).CONCLUSIONPET$ is widely used
among EORTC-BTG sites, although implementation varies and is
influenced by factors such as tracer availability, cost, and
institutional perceptions. While further data from broader
surveys including non-academic institutions is needed, the
findings support the implementation of PET as clinical trial
endpoint.},
month = {Nov},
date = {2025-11-20},
organization = {7th Quadrennial Meeting of the World
Federation of Neuro-Oncology Societies,
Honolulu (USA), 20 Nov 2025 - 23 Nov
2025},
cin = {INM-4},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406},
pnm = {5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)1},
doi = {10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.1161},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1053910},
}