% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Werner:1053911,
author = {Werner, Jan-Michael and Müller, Katharina J and Mair,
Maximilian J and Peplinski, Jana-Marie and Kraft, Manuel and
Hilgers, Julia and Ciantar, Keith G and Fink, Gereon R and
Goldbrunner, Roland and Shah, Nadim J and Mottaghy, Felix M
and Langen, Karl-Josef and Lohmann, Philipp and Preusser,
Matthias and Albert, Nathalie L and Galldiks, Norbert},
title = {{IMG}-88. {P}rognostic relevance of preoperative {FET}
{PET} in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma},
issn = {1523-5866},
reportid = {FZJ-2026-01609},
year = {2025},
abstract = {AbstractBACKGROUNDThe present study investigated the
prognostic relevance of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine
(FET) PET parameters in newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype
glioblastoma.METHODSFifty patients with newly diagnosed and
histomolecularly characterized glioblastoma according to the
WHO 2021 classification who had undergone FET PET imaging
prior to diagnostic biopsy or surgery and subsequent
postoperative radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant
temozolomide (n=36) or temozolomide plus lomustine (n=14)
were retrospectively analyzed. The nnUNet-based
$JuST_BrainPET$ tool was used for segmentation of the FET
PET tumor volume based on a tumor-to-brain ratio (TBR) of
≥1.6. All segmentations were visually checked.
Quantitative PET parameters, i.e., maximum and mean TBR
values, and metabolic tumor volumes (MTV), were correlated
with overall survival (OS) using Cox regression models.
Additional clinical parameters included age (range, 26-82
years), MGMT promoter methylation status (methylated in
$58\%$ of patients), RANO resection class (range, 2-4),
treatment regimen, and postoperative Karnofsky Performance
Status (range, $60-100\%)$ and NANO score (range, 0-7
points),RESULTSIn univariate Cox regression, preoperative
MTV (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; $95\%$ CI, 1.04-1.17; p=0.002)
and unmethylated MGMT promoter (HR, 2.82; $95\%$ CI,
1.22-6.70; p=0.016) were the only parameters significantly
associated with shorter OS. In multivariate analysis, MTV
remained prognostic (p=0.003), as well as MGMT promoter
methylation status (p=0.031). Model comparison using
Akaike’s Information Criterion favored MTV over MGMT
promoter methylation as the better overall prognostic
fit.CONCLUSIONThese data support the integration of the FET
PET tumor volume as prognostic biomarker in glioblastoma
risk stratification. Further studies with larger datasets
are needed to substantiate our findings.Topic:
positron-emission tomography biopsy glioblastoma immunologic
adjuvants pharmaceutical adjuvants foreign medical graduates
karnofsky performance status lomustine methylation
o(6)-methylguanine-dna methyltransferase preoperative care
surgical procedures, operative world health organization
brain diagnosis neoplasms patient prognosis surgery
specialty tyrosine temozolomide prognostic marker
postoperative radiotherapy stratification cox proportional
hazards models tumor volume datasets},
month = {Nov},
date = {2025-11-20},
organization = {7th Quadrennial Meeting of the World
Federation of Neuro-Oncology Societies,
Honolulu (USA), 20 Nov 2025 - 23 Nov
2025},
cin = {INM-4},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406},
pnm = {5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)1},
doi = {10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.1167},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1053911},
}