% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Wolters:1090,
author = {Wolters, A. and Linnemann, V. and van de Zande, J.C. and
Vereecken, H.},
title = {{F}ield experiment on spray drift: {D}eposition and
airborne drift during application to a winter wheat crop},
journal = {The science of the total environment},
volume = {405},
issn = {0048-9697},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {PreJuSER-1090},
pages = {269 - 277},
year = {2008},
note = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
abstract = {A field experiment was performed to evaluate various
techniques for measuring spray deposition and airborne drift
during spray application to a winter wheat crop. The
application of a spraying agent containing the fluorescent
dye Brilliant Sulfo Flavine by a conventional boom sprayer
was done according to good agricultural practice. Deposition
was measured by horizontal collectors in various
arrangements in and outside the treated area. Airborne spray
drift was measured both with a passive and an active air
collecting system. Spray deposits on top of the treated
canopy ranged between 68 and $71\%$ of the applied dose and
showed only small differences for various arrangements of
the collectors. Furthermore, only small variations were
measured within the various groups of collectors used for
these arrangements. Generally, the highest spray deposition
outside the treated area was measured close to the sprayed
plot and was accompanied by a high variability of values,
while a rapid decline of deposits was detected in more
remote areas. Estimations of spray deposits with the IMAG
Drift Calculator were in accordance with experimental
findings only for areas located at a distance of 0.5-4.5 m
from the last nozzle, while there was an overestimation of a
factor of 4 at a distance of 2.0-3.0 m, thus revealing a
high level of uncertainty of the estimation of deposition
for short distances. Airborne spray drift measured by
passive and active air collecting systems was approximately
at the same level, when taking into consideration the
collector efficiency of the woven nylon wire used as
sampling material for the passive collecting system. The
maximum value of total airborne spray drift for both spray
applications $(0.79\%$ of the applied dose) was determined
by the active collecting system. However, the comparatively
high variability of measurements at various heights above
the soil by active and passive collecting systems revealed
need for further studies to elucidate the spatial pattern of
airborne spray drift.},
keywords = {Air Movements / Air Pollutants: analysis / Environmental
Monitoring / Pest Control: instrumentation / Pest Control:
methods / Triticum / Air Pollutants (NLM Chemicals) / J
(WoSType)},
cin = {ICG-4 / JARA-ENERGY / JARA-SIM},
ddc = {333.7},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB793 / $I:(DE-82)080011_20140620$ /
I:(DE-Juel1)VDB1045},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Environmental Sciences},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:18723207},
UT = {WOS:000260941300028},
doi = {10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.060},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1090},
}