000010923 001__ 10923
000010923 005__ 20210811185912.0
000010923 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00743.x
000010923 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000283718000001
000010923 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:19760830
000010923 037__ $$aPreJuSER-10923
000010923 041__ $$aENG
000010923 082__ $$a570
000010923 084__ $$2WoS$$aEcology
000010923 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aCabin, R.$$b0
000010923 245__ $$aBridging Restoration Science and Practice: Results and Analysis of a Survey from the 2009 Society for Ecological Restoration International Meeting
000010923 260__ $$aOxford [u.a.]$$bWiley-Blackwell$$c2010
000010923 300__ $$a783 - 788
000010923 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000010923 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000010923 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000010923 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000010923 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000010923 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000010923 440_0 $$017142$$aRestoration Ecology$$v18$$x1061-2971$$y6
000010923 500__ $$aWe thank all of the 2009 SERI delegates who completed our survey so thoughtfully, SERI for facilitating this survey and supporting our Special Session, and all of the attendees at this Session for their excellent and stimulating contributions.
000010923 520__ $$aDeveloping and strengthening a more mutualistic relationship between the science of restoration ecology and the practice of ecological restoration has been a central but elusive goal of SERI since its inaugural meeting in 1989. We surveyed the delegates to the 2009 SERI World Conference to learn more about their perceptions of and ideas for improving restoration science, practice, and scientist/practitioner relationships. The respondents' assessments of restoration practice were less optimistic than their assessments of restoration science. Only 26% believed that scientist/practitioner relationships were “generally mutually beneficial and supportive of each other,” and the “science–practice gap” was the second and third most frequently cited category of factors limiting the science and practice of restoration, respectively (“insufficient funding” was first in both cases). Although few faulted practitioners for ignoring available science, many criticized scientists for ignoring the pressing needs of practitioners and/or failing to effectively communicate their work to nonscientists. Most of the suggestions for bridging the gap between restoration science and practice focused on (1) developing the necessary political support for more funding of restoration science, practice, and outreach; and (2) creating alternative research paradigms to both facilitate on-the-ground projects and promote more mutualistic exchanges between scientists and practitioners. We suggest that one way to implement these recommendations is to create a “Restoration Extension Service” modeled after the United States Department of Agriculture's Cooperative Extension Service. We also recommend more events that bring together a fuller spectrum of restoration scientists, practitioners, and relevant stakeholders.
000010923 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aTerrestrische Umwelt$$cP24$$x0
000010923 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed
000010923 65320 $$2Author$$aalternative research paradigms
000010923 65320 $$2Author$$apractical relevance
000010923 65320 $$2Author$$arestoration extension service
000010923 65320 $$2Author$$ascience-practice gap
000010923 65320 $$2Author$$aSERI survey
000010923 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aClewell, A.$$b1
000010923 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aIngram, M.$$b2
000010923 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMcDonald, T.$$b3
000010923 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129409$$aTemperton, V. M.$$b4$$uFZJ
000010923 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2020952-6$$a10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00743.x$$gVol. 18, p. 783 - 788$$p783 - 788$$q18<783 - 788$$tRestoration ecology$$v18$$x1061-2971$$y2010
000010923 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00743.x
000010923 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/10923/files/FZJ-10923.pdf$$yRestricted$$zPublished final document.
000010923 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:10923$$pVDB
000010923 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000010923 9141_ $$y2010
000010923 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$bErde und Umwelt$$kP24$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrische Umwelt$$x0
000010923 9132_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lKey Technologies for the Bioeconomy$$vPlant Science$$x0
000010923 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406$$d31.10.2010$$gICG$$kICG-3$$lPhytosphäre$$x1
000010923 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)121611
000010923 980__ $$aVDB
000010923 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000010923 980__ $$ajournal
000010923 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000010923 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000010923 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000010923 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406