Home > Publications database > Soil [N] modulates soil C cycling in CO2-fumigated tree stands: a meta-analysis > print

001     10926
005     20180208213624.0
024 7 _ |2 pmid
|a pmid:20573048
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02201.x
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000284166500001
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-10926
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 570
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Plant Sciences
100 1 _ |a Dieleman, W.I.J.
|b 0
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
245 _ _ |a Soil [N] modulates soil C cycling in CO2-fumigated tree stands: a meta-analysis
260 _ _ |a Oxford [u.a.]
|b Wiley-Blackwell
|c 2010
300 _ _ |a 2001 - 2011
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |a Plant, Cell and Environment
|x 0140-7791
|0 4976
|y 12
|v 33
500 _ _ |a We thank L. E. Henry and K. Pregitzer for providing data, as well as C. Korner for useful information about their experimental sites. Special thanks go to the researchers of the ECOCRAFT [Framework programmes of the EC (EC contracts within 5FP and 6FP, Environment and Research)] and the EUROFACE projects, who provided the large number of data that formed the foundation for this paper. M. L. is a postdoctoral research associate of the Flemish Science Foundation FWO (Fonds Wetenschappelijk onderzoek, FWO Vlaanderen). I.J. holds an FWO research grant, and S. L. holds a European Research Council (ERC) grant. Part of this research has been funded through the UA-Research Centre of Excellence ECO.
520 _ _ |a Under elevated atmospheric CO(2) concentrations, soil carbon (C) inputs are typically enhanced, suggesting larger soil C sequestration potential. However, soil C losses also increase and progressive nitrogen (N) limitation to plant growth may reduce the CO(2) effect on soil C inputs with time. We compiled a data set from 131 manipulation experiments, and used meta-analysis to test the hypotheses that: (1) elevated atmospheric CO(2) stimulates soil C inputs more than C losses, resulting in increasing soil C stocks; and (2) that these responses are modulated by N. Our results confirm that elevated CO(2) induces a C allocation shift towards below-ground biomass compartments. However, the increased soil C inputs were offset by increased heterotrophic respiration (Rh), such that soil C content was not affected by elevated CO(2). Soil N concentration strongly interacted with CO(2) fumigation: the effect of elevated CO(2) on fine root biomass and -production and on microbial activity increased with increasing soil N concentration, while the effect on soil C content decreased with increasing soil N concentration. These results suggest that both plant growth and microbial activity responses to elevated CO(2) are modulated by N availability, and that it is essential to account for soil N concentration in C cycling analyses.
536 _ _ |a Terrestrische Umwelt
|c P24
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Atmosphere
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Biomass
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Carbon Cycle
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Carbon Dioxide
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Fertilizers
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Nitrogen Cycle
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Soil: analysis
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Trees: growth & development
650 _ 7 |0 0
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a Fertilizers
650 _ 7 |0 0
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a Soil
650 _ 7 |0 124-38-9
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a Carbon Dioxide
650 _ 7 |a J
|2 WoSType
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a [CO2] enrichment
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a C sequestration
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a fine root production
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a microbial respiration
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a N fertilization
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a root biomass
700 1 _ |a Luyssaert, S.
|b 1
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Rey, A.
|b 2
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a De Angelis, P.
|b 3
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Barton, C.V.M.
|b 4
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Broadmeadow, M.S.J.
|b 5
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Broadmeadow, S.B.
|b 6
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Chigwerewe, K.S.
|b 7
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Crookshanks, M.
|b 8
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Dufrene, E.
|b 9
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Jarvis, P.G.
|b 10
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Kasurinen, A.
|b 11
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Kellomäki, S.
|b 12
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Le Dantec, V.
|b 13
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Liberloo, M.
|b 14
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Marek, M.
|b 15
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Medlyn, B.
|b 16
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Pokorny, R.
|b 17
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Scarascia-Mugnozza, G.
|b 18
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Temperton, V. M.
|b 19
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129409
700 1 _ |a Tingey, D.
|b 20
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Urban, O.
|b 21
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Ceulemans, R.
|b 22
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Janssens, I.A.
|b 23
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
773 _ _ |a 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02201.x
|g Vol. 33, p. 2001 - 2011
|p 2001 - 2011
|q 33<2001 - 2011
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2020843-1
|t Plant, cell & environment
|v 33
|y 2010
|x 0140-7791
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02201.x
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:10926
|p VDB
913 1 _ |k P24
|v Terrestrische Umwelt
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|b Erde und Umwelt
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|x 0
913 2 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Key Technologies for the Bioeconomy
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Plant Science
|x 0
914 1 _ |a Nachtrag
|y 2010
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|a JCR/ISI refereed
920 1 _ |k ICG-3
|l Phytosphäre
|d 31.10.2010
|g ICG
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406
|x 1
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)121614
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21