Home > Publications database > Pitfalls and possibilities in the analysis of biomass allocation patterns in plants > print

001     111716
005     20200423204624.0
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.3389/fpls.2012.00259
024 7 _ |2 pmid
|a pmid:23227027
024 7 _ |2 pmc
|a pmc:3514511
024 7 _ |2 Handle
|a 2128/7798
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000208837900255
024 7 _ |a altmetric:1106475
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-111716
100 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129384
|a Poorter, H.
|b 0
|u FZJ
245 _ _ |a Pitfalls and possibilities in the analysis of biomass allocation patterns in plants
260 _ _ |a Lausanne
|b Frontiers Editorial Office
|c 2012
336 7 _ |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|a Journal Article
336 7 _ |2 DataCite
|a Output Types/Journal article
336 7 _ |0 0
|2 EndNote
|a Journal Article
336 7 _ |2 BibTeX
|a ARTICLE
336 7 _ |2 ORCID
|a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
336 7 _ |2 DRIVER
|a article
440 _ 0 |0 PERI:(DE-600)2711035-7
|a Frontiers in Functional Plant Ecology
|a 10.3389/fpls.2012.00259
|v 3
500 _ _ |a Record converted from VDB: 16.11.2012
520 _ _ |a Plants can differentially allocate biomass to leaves, stems, roots, and reproduction, and follow ontogenetic trajectories that interact with the prevailing climate. Various methodological tools exist to analyze the resulting allocation patterns, based either on the calculation of biomass ratios or fractions of different organs at a given point in time, or on a so-called allometric analysis of biomass data sampled across species or over an experimental growth period. We discuss the weak and strong points of each of these methods. Although both approaches have useful features, we suggest that often a plot of biomass fractions against total plant size, either across species or in the comparison of treatment effects, combines the best of both worlds.
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|a Terrestrische Umwelt
|c P24
|x 0
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Sack, L.
|b 1
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)2711035-7
|a 10.3389/fpls.2012.00259
|g Vol. 3
|p 1-10
|t Frontiers in Functional Plant Ecology
|v 3
|x 2218-1989
|y 2012
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/111716/files/FZJ-111716.pdf
|y OpenAccess
|z Published final document.
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/111716/files/FZJ-111716.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|x icon-1440
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/111716/files/FZJ-111716.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|x icon-180
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/111716/files/FZJ-111716.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|x icon-640
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:111716
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
913 1 _ |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-240
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200
|b Erde und Umwelt
|k P24
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|v Terrestrische Umwelt
|x 0
913 2 _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Key Technologies for the Bioeconomy
|v Plant Science
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2012
915 _ _ |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY3
|2 HGFVOC
|a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
|a OpenAccess
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Medline
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b DOAJ
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
|g IBG
|k IBG-2
|l Pflanzenwissenschaften
|x 0
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)139213
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a JUWEL
980 _ _ |a FullTexts
980 1 _ |a FullTexts

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21