guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Studies on a new group of biodegradable surfactants for glyphosate > print |
| Home > Publications database > Studies on a new group of biodegradable surfactants for glyphosate > print |
| 001 | 111901 | ||
| 005 | 20190625111907.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |2 pmid |a pmid:12192908 |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |2 DOI |a 10.1002/ps.539 |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |2 WOS |a WOS:000177035400011 |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:21819275 |2 altmetric |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a PreJuSER-111901 |
| 041 | _ | _ | |a eng |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 660 |
| 084 | _ | _ | |2 WoS |a Agronomy |
| 084 | _ | _ | |2 WoS |a Entomology |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Haefs, R. |b 0 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Studies on a new group of biodegradable surfactants for glyphosate |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a New York, NY |b Wiley Interscience |c 2002 |
| 300 | _ | _ | |a 825 - 833 |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 440 | _ | 0 | |a Pest Management Science |x 1526-498X |0 14421 |y 8 |v 58 |
| 500 | _ | _ | |a Record converted from VDB: 16.11.2012 |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a The effectiveness of a homologous series of biodegradable rapeseed oil derivatives (triglyceride ethoxylates; Agnique RSO series containing an average of 5, 10, 30 and 60 units of ethylene oxide (EO) as adjuvants for foliage-applied, water-soluble, systemic active ingredients was evaluated employing glyphosate as an example. Previous experiments had revealed that the surfactants used are not phytotoxic at concentrations ranging from 1 to 10 g litre-1. The experiments were performed using Phaseolus vulgaris L and nine selected weed species, grown in a growth chamber at 25/20 (+/- 2) degrees C day/night temperature and 40/70 (+/- 10)% relative humidity. The surfactants were evaluated for enhancement of spray retention, and foliar penetration biological efficacy of glyphosate. Glyphosate was applied at a concentration of 43 mM. The surfactants were added at concentrations of 1 g litre-1. The commercial glyphosate 360 g AE litre-1 SL Roundup Ultra and unformulated glyphosate served as references. The surfactants used improved spray retention, foliar penetration and biological efficacy. Some of the formulations were comparable to the performance of Roundup Ultra in the aspects evaluated; some were even more effective in enhancing spray liquid retention and promoting glyphosate phytotoxicity in several plant species. In these studies Agnique RSO 60 generally was most effective. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a Terrestrische Umwelt |c P24 |2 G:(DE-HGF) |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407 |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Glycine: administration & dosage |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Glycine: analogs & derivatives |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Glycine: toxicity |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Herbicides: administration & dosage |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Herbicides: toxicity |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Logistic Models |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Phaseolus: drug effects |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Phaseolus: metabolism |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Surface-Active Agents: administration & dosage |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Surface-Active Agents: metabolism |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Surface-Active Agents: pharmacology |
| 650 | _ | 2 | |2 MeSH |a Time Factors |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |0 0 |2 NLM Chemicals |a Herbicides |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |0 0 |2 NLM Chemicals |a Surface-Active Agents |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |0 1071-83-6 |2 NLM Chemicals |a glyphosate |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |0 56-40-6 |2 NLM Chemicals |a Glycine |
| 650 | _ | 7 | |a J |2 WoSType |
| 653 | 2 | 0 | |2 Author |a Phaseolus vulgaris |
| 653 | 2 | 0 | |2 Author |a glyphosate |
| 653 | 2 | 0 | |2 Author |a surfactants |
| 653 | 2 | 0 | |2 Author |a spray retention |
| 653 | 2 | 0 | |2 Author |a cuticular penetration |
| 653 | 2 | 0 | |2 Author |a biological efficacy |
| 653 | 2 | 0 | |2 Author |a weeds |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Schmitz-Eiberger, M. |b 1 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Mainx, H.G. |b 2 |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Mittelstaedt, W. |b 3 |u FZJ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB1076 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Noga, G. |b 4 |u FZJ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB28496 |
| 773 | _ | _ | |0 PERI:(DE-600)2003455-6 |a 10.1002/ps.539 |g Vol. 58, p. 825 - 833 |p 825 - 833 |q 58<825 - 833 |t Pest management science |v 58 |x 1526-498X |y 2002 |
| 856 | 7 | _ | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.539 |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:111901 |p VDB |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |k P24 |v Terrestrische Umwelt |l Terrestrische Umwelt |b Erde und Umwelt |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407 |x 0 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2002 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010 |a JCR/ISI refereed |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |k IBG-3 |l Agrosphäre |g IBG |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |x 0 |
| 970 | _ | _ | |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)140531 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a ConvertedRecord |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|