000111953 001__ 111953
000111953 005__ 20200702121632.0
000111953 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:23099929
000111953 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.2134/jeq2011.0475
000111953 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000308931700004
000111953 037__ $$aPreJuSER-111953
000111953 041__ $$aeng
000111953 082__ $$a333.7
000111953 084__ $$2WoS$$aEnvironmental Sciences
000111953 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchafer, K.$$b0
000111953 245__ $$aEvaluation of a Closed Tunnel for Field-Scale Measurements of Nitrous Oxide Fluxes from an Unfertilized Grassland Soil
000111953 260__ $$aMadison, Wis.$$bASA [u.a.]$$c2012
000111953 300__ $$a1383 - 1392
000111953 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000111953 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000111953 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000111953 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000111953 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000111953 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000111953 440_0 $$03300$$aJournal of Environmental Quality$$v41$$x0047-2425$$y5
000111953 500__ $$3POF3_Assignment on 2016-02-29
000111953 500__ $$aThis study was funded by German Research Foundation (DFG). The authors thank Helmut Geistlinger, Danny Eisermann, Carsten Jahn, Michael Wiwiorra, Christoph Bonecke, Nils-Demian Landmeyer, and Joris Fahle for the effective cooperation; Markus Deurer, Heinz Flessa, Reinhard Well, Stefan Emeis, Klaus Butterbach-Bahl, Hans Papen, Peter Suppan, Hans Peter Schmid, and Richard Grant for valuable discussions; Theresa A. Norris for language editing; and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and valuable recommendations that helped to improve a previous version of the manuscript.
000111953 520__ $$aEmissions of the major greenhouse gas NO from soils are characterized by huge spatial variability. An upscaling based on conventional small-scale chamber measurements is thus questionable and may involve a considerable amount of uncertainty. In this feasibility study, we evaluated the applicability of a large, closed tunnel for field-scale measurements of NO fluxes from an unfertilized grassland soil. The tunnel, coupled to an open-path Fourier transform infrared spectrometer, covered 500 m. During a 2-yr campaign, concurrent closed-chamber measurements (area of 0.045 m) were performed at the tunnel plot. The tunnel system enabled high-density and precise NO concentration measurements under dry, stable, nocturnal atmospheric conditions, but higher wind speeds and rain limited its application. To calculate an unbiased, predeployment NO flux from the increase of NO concentrations during tunnel deployment, we propose a novel approach based on inverse modeling (IMQ0). We show that IMQ0 is appropriate for the specific non-steady state tunnel setup. Compared with conventional models, which were developed for gas flux calculation from concentration gradients measured in vented closed chambers, IMQ0 is most accurate. Whereas NO fluxes obtained from the tunnel measurements were generally small and at a typical background level, the chamber measurements revealed high spatial and temporal variability of NO emissions, including slight NO uptake and precipitation-triggered emission peaks. The cumulative NO fluxes of both methods differed by one order of magnitude and were smaller for the tunnel measurements. We argue that the chambers were occasionally susceptible to detection of hotspots and hot moments of NO emission. However, these emissions were evidently not representative for the field scale. Compared with available greenhouse gas measurement techniques, we conclude that the tunnel may serve as a gap-filling method between small-scale chamber and ecosystem-level micrometeorological techniques, particularly during stable nocturnal conditions.
000111953 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aTerrestrische Umwelt$$cP24$$x0
000111953 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed
000111953 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000111953 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBöttcher, J.$$b1
000111953 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB108056$$aWeymann, D.$$b2$$uFZJ
000111953 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$avon der Heide, C$$b3
000111953 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDuijnisveld, W.H.M.$$b4
000111953 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2050469-X$$a10.2134/jeq2011.0475$$gVol. 41, p. 1383 - 1392$$p1383 - 1392$$q41<1383 - 1392$$tJournal of environmental quality$$v41$$x0047-2425$$y2012
000111953 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0475
000111953 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:111953$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment
000111953 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF2-240$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200$$bErde und Umwelt$$kP24$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrische Umwelt$$x0
000111953 9132_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-259H$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$aDE-HGF$$bMarine, Küsten- und Polare Systeme$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vAddenda$$x0
000111953 9141_ $$y2012
000111953 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$2StatID$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000111953 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR
000111953 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000111953 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000111953 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000111953 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000111953 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000111953 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000111953 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000111953 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000111953 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000111953 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$gIBG$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000111953 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)140599
000111953 980__ $$aVDB
000111953 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000111953 980__ $$ajournal
000111953 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000111953 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED