Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Evaluation of a Closed Tunnel for Field-Scale Measurements of Nitrous Oxide Fluxes from an Unfertilized Grassland Soil > print

001     111953
005     20200702121632.0
024 7 _ |2 pmid
|a pmid:23099929
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.2134/jeq2011.0475
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000308931700004
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-111953
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 333.7
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Environmental Sciences
100 1 _ |a Schafer, K.
|b 0
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
245 _ _ |a Evaluation of a Closed Tunnel for Field-Scale Measurements of Nitrous Oxide Fluxes from an Unfertilized Grassland Soil
260 _ _ |a Madison, Wis.
|b ASA [u.a.]
|c 2012
300 _ _ |a 1383 - 1392
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |a Journal of Environmental Quality
|x 0047-2425
|0 3300
|y 5
|v 41
500 _ _ |3 POF3_Assignment on 2016-02-29
500 _ _ |a This study was funded by German Research Foundation (DFG). The authors thank Helmut Geistlinger, Danny Eisermann, Carsten Jahn, Michael Wiwiorra, Christoph Bonecke, Nils-Demian Landmeyer, and Joris Fahle for the effective cooperation; Markus Deurer, Heinz Flessa, Reinhard Well, Stefan Emeis, Klaus Butterbach-Bahl, Hans Papen, Peter Suppan, Hans Peter Schmid, and Richard Grant for valuable discussions; Theresa A. Norris for language editing; and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and valuable recommendations that helped to improve a previous version of the manuscript.
520 _ _ |a Emissions of the major greenhouse gas NO from soils are characterized by huge spatial variability. An upscaling based on conventional small-scale chamber measurements is thus questionable and may involve a considerable amount of uncertainty. In this feasibility study, we evaluated the applicability of a large, closed tunnel for field-scale measurements of NO fluxes from an unfertilized grassland soil. The tunnel, coupled to an open-path Fourier transform infrared spectrometer, covered 500 m. During a 2-yr campaign, concurrent closed-chamber measurements (area of 0.045 m) were performed at the tunnel plot. The tunnel system enabled high-density and precise NO concentration measurements under dry, stable, nocturnal atmospheric conditions, but higher wind speeds and rain limited its application. To calculate an unbiased, predeployment NO flux from the increase of NO concentrations during tunnel deployment, we propose a novel approach based on inverse modeling (IMQ0). We show that IMQ0 is appropriate for the specific non-steady state tunnel setup. Compared with conventional models, which were developed for gas flux calculation from concentration gradients measured in vented closed chambers, IMQ0 is most accurate. Whereas NO fluxes obtained from the tunnel measurements were generally small and at a typical background level, the chamber measurements revealed high spatial and temporal variability of NO emissions, including slight NO uptake and precipitation-triggered emission peaks. The cumulative NO fluxes of both methods differed by one order of magnitude and were smaller for the tunnel measurements. We argue that the chambers were occasionally susceptible to detection of hotspots and hot moments of NO emission. However, these emissions were evidently not representative for the field scale. Compared with available greenhouse gas measurement techniques, we conclude that the tunnel may serve as a gap-filling method between small-scale chamber and ecosystem-level micrometeorological techniques, particularly during stable nocturnal conditions.
536 _ _ |a Terrestrische Umwelt
|c P24
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed
650 _ 7 |a J
|2 WoSType
700 1 _ |a Böttcher, J.
|b 1
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Weymann, D.
|b 2
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB108056
700 1 _ |a von der Heide, C
|b 3
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Duijnisveld, W.H.M.
|b 4
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)2050469-X
|a 10.2134/jeq2011.0475
|g Vol. 41, p. 1383 - 1392
|p 1383 - 1392
|q 41<1383 - 1392
|t Journal of environmental quality
|v 41
|x 0047-2425
|y 2012
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0475
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:111953
|p VDB
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
913 1 _ |b Erde und Umwelt
|k P24
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-240
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200
|v Terrestrische Umwelt
|x 0
913 2 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Marine, Küsten- und Polare Systeme
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-259H
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Addenda
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2012
915 _ _ |a JCR/ISI refereed
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
920 1 _ |k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|g IBG
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|x 0
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)140599
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21