000011758 001__ 11758
000011758 005__ 20180208232854.0
000011758 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.08.005
000011758 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000284784800006
000011758 037__ $$aPreJuSER-11758
000011758 041__ $$aeng
000011758 082__ $$a630
000011758 084__ $$2WoS$$aAgronomy
000011758 084__ $$2WoS$$aForestry
000011758 084__ $$2WoS$$aMeteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
000011758 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)138662$$aHendricks-Franssen, H.-J.$$b0$$uFZJ
000011758 245__ $$aEnergy balance closure of eddy covariance data: a multi-site analysis for European FLUXNET stations
000011758 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier$$c2010
000011758 300__ $$a1553 - 1567
000011758 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000011758 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000011758 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000011758 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000011758 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000011758 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000011758 440_0 $$013761$$aAgricultural and Forest Meteorology$$v150$$x0168-1923$$y12
000011758 500__ $$aWe would like to acknowledge the coordinating efforts by the CarboEurope IP and thank especially the Pis and their collaborators from the 26 FLUXNET sites considered in this study for access to the analyzed data. Without their continued efforts this study would not have been possible. We are also thankful to the reviewers and editor (Timothy Griffis), who helped to improve this manuscript considerably. In addition, we thank especially Alexander Graf, and also Dennis Baldocchi, Thomas Foken, Markus Reichstein, Anders Lindroth and Dario Papale for useful comments. Partial financial support was received from the EU 7th Framework Programme GENESIS Project No. 226536 and the CCES project MAIOLICA.
000011758 520__ $$aThis paper presents a multi-site (>20) analysis of the relative and absolute energy balance (EB) closure at European FLUXNET sites, as a function of the stability parameter xi, the friction velocity u., thermally-induced turbulence, and the time of the day. A focus of the analysis is the magnitude of EB deficits for very unstable conditions. A univariate analysis of the relative EB deficit as function of xi alone (both for individual sites and a synthesis for all sites), reveals that the relative EB deficit is larger for very unstable conditions (xi < -1.0) than for less unstable conditions (-0.02 > xi >= -1.0). A bivariate analysis of the relative EB deficit as function of both xi and u., however, indicates that for situations with comparable u. the closure is better for very unstable conditions than for less unstable conditions. Our results suggest that the poorer closure for very unstable conditions identified from the univariate analysis is due to reduced u. under these conditions. In addition, we identify that the conditions characterized by smallest relative EB deficits (elevated overall turbulence, mostly during day time) correspond to cases with the largest absolute EB deficits. Thus, the total EB deficit at the sites is induced mostly under these conditions, which is particularly relevant for evapotranspiration estimates. Further, situations with the largest relative EB deficits are generally characterized by small absolute EB deficits. We also find that the relative EB deficit does generally not correspond to the regression line of absolute EB deficit with the net radiation because there is a (positive or negative) offset. This can be understood from theoretical considerations. Finally, we find that storage effects explain a considerable fraction of the large relative (but small absolute) nocturnal EB deficits, and only a limited fraction of the overall relative and absolute EB deficits. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
000011758 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aTerrestrische Umwelt$$cP24$$x0
000011758 536__ $$0G:(EU-Grant)226536$$aGENESIS - Groundwater and dependent Ecosystems: NEw Scientific basIS on climate change and land-use impacts for the update of the EU Groundwater Directive (226536)$$c226536$$fFP7-ENV-2008-1$$x1
000011758 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science
000011758 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000011758 65320 $$2Author$$aLand-atmosphere interactions
000011758 65320 $$2Author$$aEddy covariance flux measurements
000011758 65320 $$2Author$$aEnergy balance closure
000011758 65320 $$2Author$$aAtmospheric stability
000011758 65320 $$2Author$$aFriction velocity
000011758 65320 $$2Author$$aThermal turbulence
000011758 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aStöckli, R.$$b1
000011758 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLehner, I.$$b2
000011758 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRotenberg, E.$$b3
000011758 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSeneviratne, S.I.$$b4
000011758 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2012165-9$$a10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.08.005$$gVol. 150, p. 1553 - 1567$$p1553 - 1567$$q150<1553 - 1567$$tAgricultural and forest meteorology$$v150$$x0168-1923$$y2010
000011758 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.08.005
000011758 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:11758$$pec_fundedresources$$pVDB$$popenaire
000011758 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$kP24$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrische Umwelt$$x0
000011758 9141_ $$y2010
000011758 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000011758 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)VDB793$$d31.10.2010$$gICG$$kICG-4$$lAgrosphäre$$x1
000011758 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)123084
000011758 980__ $$aVDB
000011758 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000011758 980__ $$ajournal
000011758 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000011758 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000011758 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118