% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Stingaciu:11759,
author = {Stingaciu, L.-R. and Weihermüller, L. and Haber-Pohlmeier,
S. and Stapf, S. and Vereecken, H. and Pohlmeier, A.},
title = {{D}etermination of pore size distribution and hydraulic
properties using nuclear magnetic resonance ({NMR})
relaxometry: a comparative study of laboratory methods (nur
online)},
journal = {Water resources research},
volume = {46},
issn = {0043-1397},
address = {Washington, DC},
publisher = {AGU},
reportid = {PreJuSER-11759},
year = {2010},
note = {Many thanks to Mathieu Javaux and Guido Rentmeesters from
UCL, Belgium, for access to and help with Hg intrusion
measurements; the DFG (project PO 746/2-1) for financial
support; Peter Blumler and Normen Hermes (FZ Juelich) for
help with the low-field setup; Anke Langen and Benedikt
Scharnagl (FZ Juelich, ICG4) for various retention function
measurements; and Claudia Walraf for BET measurements. The
reviewers of the paper are also acknowledged for their
useful comments and suggestions, which greatly helped us
understand and interpret our measurements.},
abstract = {[ 1] In this study, we evaluate the feasibility of using
nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxometry measurements to
characterize pore size distribution and hydraulic properties
in four porous samples with different texture and
composition. We compare NMR with two classical techniques
based on water retention and mercury intrusion measurements.
Both T-2 and T-1 NMR relaxation measurements at 6.47 MHz
were carried out for three saturated model samples (medium
sand, fine sand, and a homogenous sand/kaolin clay mixture)
and one saturated natural silt loam soil. Cumulative pore
size distribution functions and mean pore diameters were
calculated assuming average surface relaxivity parameters
and a cylindrical capillary model of the pores. The mean
pore diameters derived from T-2 and T-1 distributions as
well as the cumulative pore size distribution functions
agree satisfactorily with those derived from mercury
intrusion and retention curves. The observed deviations are
due to limitations of each method, sample preparation, and
sample composition. To evaluate the influence of the
variations observed in the hydraulic properties of the
samples, the pore size distribution functions were scaled
back to water retention functions, and the van Genuchten
hydraulic parameters were estimated by inversion using the
RETC software. The comparison shows that both T-2 and T-1
NMR relaxation measurements can be used to estimate pore
size distribution and mean pore diameter, as well as the
retention function and corresponding hydraulic properties.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {ICG-4 / JARA-ENERGY / JARA-HPC},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB793 / $I:(DE-82)080011_20140620$ /
$I:(DE-82)080012_20140620$},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Environmental Sciences / Limnology / Water Resources},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000283951500003},
doi = {10.1029/2009WR008686},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/11759},
}