% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{vandeBoer:129136,
      author       = {van de Boer, A. and Moene, A.F. and Schüttemeyer, D. and
                      Graf, Alexander},
      title        = {{S}ensitivity and uncertainty of analytical footprint
                      models according to a combined natural tracer and ensemble
                      approach},
      journal      = {Agricultural and forest meteorology},
      volume       = {169},
      issn         = {0168-1923},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2013-00656},
      pages        = {1 - 11},
      year         = {2013},
      abstract     = {Evaluations of analytical footprint models using data from
                      several stations located in different land use types are
                      still scarce, but valuable for defining the spatial context
                      of the measurements. Therefore, we evaluated two analytical
                      footprint models by applying a ‘forward’ and an
                      ‘inversion’ method. We used eddy covariance measurements
                      from a flat agricultural landscape in western Germany in the
                      summer of 2009, with seven eddy covariance systems over
                      three different land use types with contrasting sensible
                      heat fluxes. We found that the model of Hsieh et al. (2000.
                      Adv. Water Resour. 23, 765–772) and of Kormann and Meixner
                      (2001. Boundary Layer Meteorol. 99, 207–224) are both
                      overestimating the distance of the peak contribution of the
                      footprint. In our evaluation, the former model performs
                      slightly better, independent of whether the crosswind
                      dispersion was used from the latter model, or from the
                      proposed model by Detto et al. (2006. Water Resour. Res. 42,
                      1–16).},
      cin          = {IBG-3},
      ddc          = {630},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
      pnm          = {246 - Modelling and Monitoring Terrestrial Systems: Methods
                      and Technologies (POF2-246) / DFG project 139819005 - Links
                      between local scale and catchment scale measurements and
                      modelling of gas exchange processes over land surfaces
                      (139819005)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF2-246 / G:(GEPRIS)139819005},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000314087400001},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.016},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/129136},
}