000132926 001__ 132926
000132926 005__ 20230310131401.0
000132926 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.02.001
000132926 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0168-1923
000132926 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1873-2240
000132926 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000318382900001
000132926 037__ $$aFZJ-2013-01502
000132926 082__ $$a630
000132926 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129461$$aGraf, Alexander$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000132926 245__ $$aValidation of a minimum microclimate disturbance chamber for net ecosystem flux measurements
000132926 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier$$c2013
000132926 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1365596736_19800
000132926 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000132926 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000132926 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000132926 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000132926 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000132926 500__ $$3POF3_Assignment on 2016-02-29
000132926 520__ $$aA minimum-disturbance chamber for canopy net CO2 and H2O flux measurements is described. The system is a passively (optionally actively) ventilated tunnel with large (similar to 0.14 m2) in- and outlet cross sections covering a surface area of approximately 1.6 m2. A differential, non-drying closed-path gas analyzer is used to minimize the requirement for concentration build-ups or drawdowns between the in- and outlet, and 0.05 mm thick FEP (fluorinated ethylene propylene) film is used as top and wall material to minimize radiation modifications.    First measurement results in passively ventilated mode are presented from two different sites: a wheat field at a lowland site in the westernmost part of Germany, and differently cropped adjacent fields in the Pyrenee foothills in France, including grassland and a cereal-dominated crop mixture for fodder production. Flux estimates derived from measurements over 20–30 min deployments were compared to concurrent observations by three eddy covariance (EC) stations. The system compared well to EC measurements, with bias of −6.6% for latent heat flux and +9.0% for CO2 flux (R2 = 0.78 and 0.74, respectively).    The presence of the chamber causes a reduction of less than 4% in incoming shortwave radiation, and an increase of about 18% in downward longwave radiation. Near the outlet, CO2 concentration was on average modified by −3% with respect to outside conditions, water vapour concentration by +22%, and temperature by +0.9 K, staying below published modifications of a comparable non-steady-state chamber closed for 2 min. Ventilation speed varied by less than 9% across the inlet cross section. Limitations include a minimum wind speed requirement that can be set as low as 0.2 m s−1 for a raw data logging frequency of 1 s−1 or higher, but would need to be higher for slow-response gas analyzers. At the same time, a measurement period of 10 min or more is recommended to minimize random errors from storage term fluctuations. A correction for the added water vapour volume by evapotranspiration is derived and tested, which typically affects H2O flux itself by less than +2% and CO2 flux measurements by 1 μmol/J latent heat.
000132926 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-246$$a246 - Modelling and Monitoring Terrestrial Systems: Methods and Technologies (POF2-246)$$cPOF2-246$$fPOF II$$x0
000132926 536__ $$0G:(GEPRIS)139819005$$aDFG project 139819005 - Links between local scale and catchment scale measurements and modelling of gas exchange processes over land surfaces (139819005)$$c139819005$$x1
000132926 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, juser.fz-juelich.de
000132926 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWerner, J.$$b1
000132926 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLangensiepen, M.$$b2
000132926 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$avan de Boer, A.$$b3
000132926 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)144420$$aSchmidt, Marius$$b4$$ufzj
000132926 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKupisch, M.$$b5
000132926 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aVereecken, H.$$b6$$ufzj
000132926 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2012165-9$$a10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.02.001$$gVol. 174-175, p. 1 - 14$$p1 - 14$$tAgricultural and forest meteorology$$v174-175$$x0168-1923$$y2013
000132926 8564_ $$uhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192313000269
000132926 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/132926/files/FZJ-2013-01502.pdf$$yRestricted
000132926 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:132926$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pVDB
000132926 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129461$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b0$$kFZJ
000132926 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)144420$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b4$$kFZJ
000132926 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b6$$kFZJ
000132926 9132_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-259H$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$aDE-HGF$$bMarine, Küsten- und Polare Systeme$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vAddenda$$x0
000132926 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-246$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF2-240$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF2$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vModelling and Monitoring Terrestrial Systems: Methods and Technologies$$x0
000132926 9141_ $$y2013
000132926 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$2StatID$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000132926 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR
000132926 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000132926 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000132926 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000132926 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000132926 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000132926 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000132926 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000132926 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000132926 920__ $$lyes
000132926 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000132926 980__ $$ajournal
000132926 980__ $$aVDB
000132926 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000132926 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118