001     133044
005     20210129211415.0
024 7 _ |a 10.2967/jnumed.112.109603
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:23232275
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 0097-9058
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0161-5505
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1535-5667
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0022-3123
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a WOS:000314691200023
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:1123429
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2013-01608
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Rapp, M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Diagnostic Performance of 18F-FET PET in Newly Diagnosed Cerebral Lesions Suggestive of Glioma
260 _ _ |a Reston, Va.
|c 2013
|b SNM84042
264 _ 1 |3 online
|2 Crossref
|b Society of Nuclear Medicine
|c 2012-12-11
264 _ 1 |3 print
|2 Crossref
|b Society of Nuclear Medicine
|c 2013-02-01
264 _ 1 |3 print
|2 Crossref
|b Society of Nuclear Medicine
|c 2013-02-01
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1376381476_2903
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
500 _ _ |3 POF3_Assignment on 2016-02-29
520 _ _ |a The aim of this study was to assess the clinical value of O-(2-(18)F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine ((18)F-FET) PET in the initial diagnosis of cerebral lesions suggestive of glioma.In a retrospective study, we analyzed the clinical, radiologic, and neuropathologic data of 174 patients (77 women and 97 men; mean age, 45 ± 15 y) who had been referred for neurosurgical assessment of unclear brain lesions and had undergone (18)F-FET PET. Initial histology (n = 168, confirmed after surgery or biopsy) and the clinical course and follow-up MR imaging in 2 patients revealed 66 high-grade gliomas (HGG), 77 low-grade gliomas (LGG), 2 lymphomas, and 25 nonneoplastic lesions (NNL). In a further 4 patients, initial histology was unspecific, but during the course of the disease all patients developed an HGG. The diagnostic value of maximum and mean tumor-to-brain ratios (TBR(max/)TBR(mean)) of (18)F-FET uptake was assessed using receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve analyses to differentiate between neoplastic lesions and NNL, between HGG and LGG, and between high-grade tumor (HGG or lymphoma) and LGG or NNL.Neoplastic lesions showed significantly higher (18)F-FET uptake than NNL (TBR(max), 3.0 ± 1.3 vs. 1.8 ± 0.5; P < 0.001). ROC analysis yielded an optimal cutoff of 2.5 for TBR(max) to differentiate between neoplastic lesions and NNLs (sensitivity, 57%; specificity, 92%; accuracy, 62%; area under the curve [AUC], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.84). The positive predictive value (PPV) was 98%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 27%. ROC analysis for differentiation between HGG and LGG (TBR(max), 3.6 ± 1.4 vs. 2.4 ± 1.0; P < 0.001) yielded an optimal cutoff of 2.5 for TBR(max) (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 65%; accuracy, 72%; AUC, 0.77; PPV, 66%; NPV, 79%; 95% CI, 0.68-0.84). Best differentiation between high-grade tumors (HGG or lymphoma) and both NNL and LGG was achieved with a TBR(max) cutoff of 2.5 (sensitivity, 79%; specificity, 72%; accuracy, 75%; AUC, 0.79; PPV, 65%; NPV, 84%; 95% CI, 0.71-0.86). The results for TBR(mean) were similar with a cutoff of 1.9.(18)F-FET uptake ratios provide valuable additional information for the differentiation of cerebral lesions and the grading of gliomas. TBR(max) of (18)F-FET uptake beyond the threshold of 2.5 has a high PPV for detection of a neoplastic lesion and supports the necessity of an invasive procedure, for example, biopsy or surgical resection. Low (18)F-FET uptake (TBR(max) < 2.5) excludes a high-grade tumor with high probability.
536 _ _ |a 333 - Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Neurological and Psychiatric Diseases (POF2-333)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-333
|c POF2-333
|x 0
|f POF II
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, juser.fz-juelich.de, PubMed,
700 1 _ |a Heinzel, Alexander
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)132315
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Galldiks, Norbert
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)143792
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Stoffels, Gabriele
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131627
|b 3
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Felsberg, Jörg
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Ewelt, Christian
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Sabel, Michael
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Steiger, Hans J
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Reifenberger, Guido
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Beez, Thomas
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Coenen, Heinrich Hubert
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131816
|b 10
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Floeth, Frank W
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Langen, Karl-Josef
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131777
|b 12
|u fzj
773 1 8 |a 10.2967/jnumed.112.109603
|b : Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2012-12-11
|n 2
|p 229-235
|3 journal-article
|2 Crossref
|t Journal of Nuclear Medicine
|v 54
|y 2012
|x 0161-5505
773 _ _ |a 10.2967/jnumed.112.109603
|g Vol. 54, no. 2, p. 229 - 235
|p 229-235
|n 2
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2040222-3
|t Journal of nuclear medicine
|v 54
|y 2012
|x 0161-5505
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/133044/files/FZJ-2013-01608.pdf
|y Restricted
909 _ _ |p VDB
|o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:133044
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:133044
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)132315
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)143792
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131627
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 10
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131816
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 12
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131777
913 2 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-579H
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Addenda
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Funktion und Dysfunktion des Nervensystems
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-330
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-333
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-300
|v Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Neurological and Psychiatric Diseases
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF2
914 1 _ |y 2013
915 _ _ |a JCR/ISI refereed
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
|k INM-3
|l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406
|k INM-4
|l Physik der Medizinischen Bildgebung
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-5-20090406
|k INM-5
|l Nuklearchemie
|x 2
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-5-20090406
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-5-20090406


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21