% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Schilbach:133109,
      author       = {Schilbach, L. and Eickhoff, Simon and Schultze, T and
                      Mojzisch, A and Vogeley, K},
      title        = {{T}o you {I} am listening: {P}erceived competence of
                      advisors influences judgment and decision-making via
                      recruitment of the amygdala},
      journal      = {Social neuroscience},
      volume       = {8},
      number       = {3},
      issn         = {1747-0927},
      address      = {New York [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Psychology Press},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2013-01657},
      pages        = {189-202},
      year         = {2013},
      abstract     = {Considering advice from others is a pervasive element of
                      human social life. We used the judge-advisor paradigm to
                      investigate the neural correlates of advice evaluation and
                      advice integration by means of functional magnetic resonance
                      imaging. Our results demonstrate that evaluating advice
                      recruits the 'mentalizing network,' brain regions activated
                      when people think about others' mental states. Important
                      activation differences exist, however, depending upon the
                      perceived competence of the advisor. Consistently,
                      additional analyses demonstrate that integrating others'
                      advice, i.e., how much participants actually adjust their
                      initial estimate, correlates with neural activity in the
                      centromedial amygdala in the case of a competent and with
                      activity in visual cortex in the case of an incompetent
                      advisor. Taken together, our findings, therefore,
                      demonstrate that advice evaluation and integration rely on
                      dissociable neural mechanisms and that significant
                      differences exist depending upon the advisor's reputation,
                      which suggests different modes of processing advice
                      depending upon the perceived competence of the advisor.},
      cin          = {INM-1 / INM-3},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-1-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {333 - Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Neurological and
                      Psychiatric Diseases (POF2-333)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF2-333},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:23485131},
      UT           = {WOS:000317270700001},
      doi          = {10.1080/17470919.2013.775967},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/133109},
}