% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@PHDTHESIS{Mboh:133236,
author = {Mboh, Cho Miltin},
title = {{C}oupled {H}ydrogeophysical inversion for soil hydraulic
property estimation from time-lapse geophysical data},
volume = {154},
school = {Universität Bonn},
type = {Dr.},
address = {Jülich},
publisher = {Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Zentralbibliothek, Verlag},
reportid = {FZJ-2013-01774},
isbn = {978-3-89336-823-5},
series = {Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich : Energie $\&$
Umwelt / Energy $\&$ Environment},
pages = {79 p.},
year = {2012},
note = {Universität Bonn, Diss., 2012},
abstract = {Good knowledge of the hydraulic properties of the vadose
zone is important for understanding water flow and solute
transport processes therein. This can help to promote
sustainable use and mitigate anthropogenic threats to soil
and water resources. The use of time-lapse geophysical data
to constrain our understanding of the flow and transport
properties of the vadose zone is now well recognised.
Conventional use of geophysical data to estimate the
hydraulic properties of the vadose zone is based on an
uncoupled inversion approach including an ill-posed
tomograhic inversion step which can lead to error
propagation to the estimated hydraulic properties. One way
of improving the accuracy of estimating soil hydraulic
properties is to use a so-called coupled hydrogeophysical
inversion approach. In this inversion approach, the
tomograhic inversion step is avoided as geophysical
measurements are directly used in the hydrological inverse
problem by coupling a forward model of the geophysical
measurements with a hydrological model describing the
hydrologic processes under investigation. Although the
potential benefits of the coupled inversion approach have
been illustrated with synthetic data, there are very few
applications of the approach to actual field or laboratory
data. Moreover, most studies using this approach focused on
electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and ground
penetration radar (GPR), and the usefulness of this
inversion approach remains to be explored for a range of
other geophysical methods. Although coupled hydrogeophysical
inversion frameworks are flexible enough for the integration
of multiple hydrologic and geophysical data types, this data
fusion aspect has also received less attention. Therefore,
the aim of this thesis was to develop inversion frameworks
for the estimation of effective subsurface hydraulic
parameters from: i) the fusion of ERT and inflow data
obtained under constant head infiltration in a field sandy
loam, ii) SP data acquired during primary drainage of a
sandy soil column, and iii) TDR data obtained under falling
head infiltration into an initially dry sandy loam. Based on
synthetic and actual data we showed that it is feasible to
estimate three key Mualem-van Genuchten parameters (α, n
and Ks), using the developed coupled hydrogeophysical
inversion frameworks for ERT, SP and TDR. In all cases, the
inversion results compared well with independently obtained
values. With respect to the fusion of ERT and inflow data,
it was observed that the success of the procedure depends on
the choice of an appropriate objective function. The best
results were obtained when an objective function defined as
the sum of the root mean square error of both data types
normalized by the standard deviation of the respective
measurements was used. On the other hand, successful
inversion of the SP data depended on efficient pre-treatment
of the measured signals prior to inversion and the
availability of an adequate model for the voltage coupling
coefficient at partial saturation. By comparing different
models for the voltage coupling coefficient at partial
saturation to the experimental data, it was observed that
models that relate the voltage coupling coefficient to the
relative permeability of the porous medium in addition to
the saturation in water were most appropriate. In the case
of inversion of TDR data, a comparison of the coupled and
uncoupled inversion approaches revealed that the coupled
inversion approach is more practical and less uncertain.
Particularly it was observed that coupled hydrogeophysical
inversion enables simultaneous monitoring of ponding depth
and water infiltration, which avoids the laborious task of
manually measuring the ponding depths and can thus enable
rapid estimation of the soil hydraulic parameters for
multiple locations through automatic measurements of ponded
infiltration for multiple rings through TDR multiplexing.
Future studies should focus on using the coupled
hydrogeophysical inversion approach to estimate spatially
varying hydraulic properties which are more characteristic
of the vadose zone. At the expense of a higher computational
cost, better estimates of parameter uncertainties can be
obtained with the use of MCMC algorithms that provide
posterior probability distributions of the inverted
parameters.},
keywords = {Dissertation (GND)},
cin = {IBG-3},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {246 - Modelling and Monitoring Terrestrial Systems: Methods
and Technologies (POF2-246)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF2-246},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/133236},
}