% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Temperton:133484,
      author       = {Temperton, Vicky and Higgs, E. and Choi, Y.D. and Allen, E.
                      and Lamb, D. and Lee, C.-S. and Harris, J. and Hobbs, R.J.
                      and Zedler, J.B.},
      title        = {{F}lexible and {A}daptable {R}estoration: {A}n {E}xample
                      from {S}outh {K}orea},
      journal      = {Restoration ecology},
      volume       = {22},
      number       = {3},
      issn         = {1061-2971},
      address      = {Oxford [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Wiley-Blackwell},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2013-01929},
      pages        = {271–278},
      year         = {2014},
      abstract     = {Ecological restoration is set to play a key role in
                      mitigating biodiversity loss. While many restorationists
                      worry about what to do about and what to call rapidly
                      changing ecosystems (no-analog, novel, or other terms),
                      ecologists and managers in some parts of the world have
                      avoided these controversies and proceeded with developing
                      and implementing innovative restoration projects. We discuss
                      examples from South Korea, including the Cheonggyecheon
                      river project in Seoul and the new National Institute of
                      Ecology, which combines scientific research, planted
                      reference systems for future restoration, and an Ecorium for
                      outreach and education. South Korea faces a range of
                      restoration challenges, including managing even-aged planted
                      forests, major land use changes (especially urbanization)
                      affecting valuable tidal flats, and fragmented landscapes
                      caused by intensive land use and the fenced Demilitarized
                      Zone (DMZ). The examples from South Korea provide insights
                      that might guide future actions more broadly. These include
                      flexible targets for restoration not based on historical
                      precedents, considering ecosystem functions and functional
                      trait diversity as well as species composition, creating
                      model restoration projects, and managing adaptively.},
      cin          = {IBG-2},
      ddc          = {570},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
      pnm          = {242 - Sustainable Bioproduction (POF2-242) / 89582 - Plant
                      Science (POF2-89582)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF2-242 / G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89582},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000336842500001},
      doi          = {10.1111/rec.12095},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/133484},
}