% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Mboh:133500,
author = {Mboh, C. M. and Huisman, J. A. and van Gaelen, N. and
Rings, J. and Vereecken, H.},
title = {{C}oupled hydrogeophysical inversion of electrical
resistances and inflow measurements for topsoil hydraulic
properties under constant head infiltration},
journal = {Near surface geophysics},
volume = {10},
number = {5},
issn = {1569-4445},
address = {Houten},
publisher = {EAGE},
reportid = {FZJ-2013-01938},
pages = {413 - 426},
year = {2012},
note = {C.M. Mboh and J.A. Huisman gratefully acknowledge support
by grant HU1312/2-1 and HU1312/2-2 of the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft. The reviewers (C. Mendonca, R.P.
Singh and M. Devanatha) are thanked for their constructive
comments that improved the quality of the manuscript.},
abstract = {Accurate estimation of topsoil hydraulic properties is
important for understanding water flow and solute transport
in the vadose zone. Coupled hydrogeophysical inversion
schemes that enable the use of multiple geophysical and
hydrological data for the estimation of soil hydraulic
properties have recently been proposed. In these coupled
inversion schemes, a hydrological model describing the
process under investigation is coupled to a forward
geophysical model and hydraulic parameters are directly
estimated from geophysical measurements. While these schemes
provide a suitable platform for the integration of multiple
geophysical and hydrological data, efficient methods to
combine these data types for improved parameter estimation
still warrant investigation. In this study, we investigated
the feasibility of estimating three topsoil Mualem-van
Genuchten parameters from the fusion of inflow and
electrical resistance measurements obtained under constant
head infiltration. In addition to using only inflow or
electrical resistances, we investigated three methods of
combining these data for improved estimation of topsoil
hydraulic parameters. Our results show that using inflow
alone does not provide a unique solution to the inverse
problem. Better results are obtained with the additional use
of electrical resistance data. We show that successful data
fusion within the coupled hydrogeophysical inversion
framework depends on the choice of an appropriate objective
function. We obtained the best data fusion results with an
objective function defined as the sum of the root mean
square error of both data types normalized by the standard
deviation of the respective measurements. In this case, the
inverted hydraulic parameters were very comparable to
reference values obtained from a multi-step outflow
experiment carried out with undisturbed soil cores from the
experimental site. It is concluded that the coupled
hydrogeophysical inversion framework is a promising tool for
non-invasive near-surface hydrological investigations.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {246 - Modelling and Monitoring Terrestrial Systems: Methods
and Technologies (POF2-246)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF2-246},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000310424400006},
doi = {10.3997/1873-0604.2012009},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/133500},
}