% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Valladares:133590,
author = {Valladares, F. and Matesanz, S. and Araujo, M. and
Balaguer, L. and Benito, M. and Cornwell, W. and Gianoli, E.
and Guilhaumon, F. and van Kleunen, M. and Naya, D.E. and
Nicotra, A. and Poorter, Hendrik and Zavala, M.A.},
title = {{T}he effects of phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation
on forecasts pf species range shifts under climate change},
journal = {Ecology letters},
volume = {17},
number = {11},
issn = {1461-023x},
address = {Oxford [u.a.]},
publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
reportid = {FZJ-2013-02010},
pages = {1351–1364},
year = {2014},
abstract = {Species are the unit of analysis in many global change and
conservation biology studies; however, species are not
uniform entities but are composed of different, sometimes
locally adapted, populations differing in plasticity. We
examined how intraspecific variation in thermal niches and
phenotypic plasticity will affect species distributions in a
warming climate. We first developed a conceptual model
linking plasticity and niche breadth, providing five
alternative intraspecific scenarios that are consistent with
existing literature. Secondly, we used ecological
niche-modeling techniques to quantify the impact of each
intraspecific scenario on the distribution of a virtual
species across a geographically realistic setting. Finally,
we performed an analogous modeling exercise using real data
on the climatic niches of different tree provenances. We
show that when population differentiation is accounted for
and dispersal is restricted, forecasts of species range
shifts under climate change are even more pessimistic than
those using the conventional assumption of homogeneously
high plasticity across a species' range. Suitable
population-level data are not available for most species so
identifying general patterns of population differentiation
could fill this gap. However, the literature review revealed
contrasting patterns among species, urging greater levels of
integration among empirical, modeling and theoretical
research on intraspecific phenotypic variation.},
cin = {IBG-2},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {242 - Sustainable Bioproduction (POF2-242) / 89582 - Plant
Science (POF2-89582)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF2-242 / G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89582},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000345215900002},
pubmed = {pmid:25205436},
doi = {10.1111/ele.12348},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/133590},
}