001     134247
005     20210129211615.0
024 7 _ |a WOS:000320500000052
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a 10.1073/pnas.1119041110
|2 DOI
024 7 _ |a altmetric:1559780
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:23674685
|2 pmid
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2013-02495
082 _ _ |a 000
100 1 _ |a Schröder, Gunnar
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)132018
|b 0
|u fzj
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Cross-validation in cryo-EM-based structural modeling
260 _ _ |a Washington, DC
|c 2013
|b Academy
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1384517377_13491
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
500 _ _ |3 POF3_Assignment on 2016-02-29
520 _ _ |a Single-particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is a powerful approach to determine the structure of large macromolecules and assemblies thereof in many cases at subnanometer resolution. It has become popular to refine or flexibly fit atomic models into density maps derived from cryo-EM experiments. These density maps are typically significantly lower in resolution than electron density maps obtained from X-ray diffraction experiments, such that the number of parameters that need to be determined is much larger than the number of experimental observables. Overfitting and misinterpretation of the density, thus, becomes a serious problem. For diffraction data a cross-validation approach has been introduced almost twenty years ago, however, no such approach has been described yet for structure refinement against cryo-EM density maps, even though the overfitting problem is, due to the lower resolution, significantly larger. We present a cross-validation approach for real-space refinement against cryo-EM density maps in analogy to cross-validation typically used in crystallography. Our approach is able to detect overfitting and allows for optimizing the choice of restraints used in the refinement. The approach is demonstrated on three protein structures with simulated data and on experimental data of the rotavirus double-layer particle. Since cross-validation requires splitting the data set into at least two independent sets, we further present an approach to quantify correlations between the structure factor sets. This analysis is also helpful for other cross-validation applications, such as refinements against diffraction data or 3D reconstructions of cryo-EM density maps.
536 _ _ |a 452 - Structural Biology (POF2-452)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-452
|c POF2-452
|x 0
|f POF II
700 1 _ |a Falkner, Benjamin
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)162497
|b 1
|u fzj
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)1461794-8
|v 110
|t Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|p 8930-8935
|n 22
|a 10.1073/pnas.1119041110
856 4 _ |u http://www.pnas.org/content/110/22/8930.full.pdf+html
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/134247/files/FZJ-2013-02495.pdf
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:134247
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)132018
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)162497
913 2 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l BioSoft – Fundamentals for future Technologies in the fields of Soft Matter and Life Sciences
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-550
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-559H
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Addenda
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Schlüsseltechnologien
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-450
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-452
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-400
|v Structural Biology
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF2
|l BioSoft
914 1 _ |y 2013
915 _ _ |a JCR/ISI refereed
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a National-Konsortium
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0430
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1040
|2 StatID
|b Zoological Record
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)ICS-6-20110106
|k ICS-6
|l Strukturbiochemie
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICS-6-20110106
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBI-7-20200312


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21