% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Altdorff:134439,
author = {Altdorff, Daniel and Dietrich, Peter},
title = {{C}ombination of electromagnetic induction and gamma
spectrometry using {K}-means clustering: {A} study for
evaluation of site partitioning},
journal = {Journal of plant nutrition and soil science},
volume = {175},
number = {3},
issn = {1436-8730},
address = {Weinheim},
publisher = {Wiley-VCH},
reportid = {FZJ-2013-02638},
pages = {345 - 354},
year = {2012},
abstract = {Today rapid survey methods of proximal soil sensing (PSS)
provide an increasing number of different and highly
resolved data. These multidimensional data sets can lead to
multilayered and complex maps of parameters which are only
indirectly related to soil properties and soil functions.
However, in applications usually just one clear elementary
map is required. It is of increasing importance to tackle
this problem utilizing a cluster algorithm for the synthesis
and reduction of multidimensional input variables. The
cluster algorithm provides a partitioning of the
investigated site whereby the units are characterized by the
statistics of the PSS data. Therefore, the question that
arises is how suitable is the suggested partitioning in
terms of the delineation of different soil units. In this
study, we investigate the suitability of cluster
partitioning through a case study at a medium-scale test
site (≈ 50 000 m2). Two common PSS methods:
electromagnetic induction (EMI) and gamma spectrometry (GS)
will be employed to create a data set for partitioning by a
K-means cluster. The result of the cluster analysis is a
delineation of three different parts. In contrast to
previous studies, we evaluate the generated partitions by
independent soil properties such as grain size, horizon
thickness, and color of stratified randomly taken soil
samples. The soil analyses show that one of three clusters
significantly differs from the others in terms of grain-size
distribution and horizon thickness. The partitioning of the
other two clusters could not be confirmed by the considered
soil parameters. Nevertheless, the case study demonstrates
the combination of different PSS data by K-means clustering
as a potential approach for site partitioning. An evaluation
of the results of the cluster analysis through the
collection and analysis of soil samples is highly
recommended.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {246 - Modelling and Monitoring Terrestrial Systems: Methods
and Technologies (POF2-246)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF2-246},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000304598900003},
doi = {10.1002/jpln.201100262},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/134439},
}