001     134439
005     20210129211652.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1002/jpln.201100262
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1522-2624
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1436-8730
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0044-3263
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a WOS:000304598900003
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2013-02638
082 _ _ |a 570
100 1 _ |a Altdorff, Daniel
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)136836
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Combination of electromagnetic induction and gamma spectrometry using K-means clustering: A study for evaluation of site partitioning
260 _ _ |a Weinheim
|c 2012
|b Wiley-VCH
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1370267938_5428
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
500 _ _ |3 POF3_Assignment on 2016-02-29
520 _ _ |a Today rapid survey methods of proximal soil sensing (PSS) provide an increasing number of different and highly resolved data. These multidimensional data sets can lead to multilayered and complex maps of parameters which are only indirectly related to soil properties and soil functions. However, in applications usually just one clear elementary map is required. It is of increasing importance to tackle this problem utilizing a cluster algorithm for the synthesis and reduction of multidimensional input variables. The cluster algorithm provides a partitioning of the investigated site whereby the units are characterized by the statistics of the PSS data. Therefore, the question that arises is how suitable is the suggested partitioning in terms of the delineation of different soil units. In this study, we investigate the suitability of cluster partitioning through a case study at a medium-scale test site (≈ 50 000 m2). Two common PSS methods: electromagnetic induction (EMI) and gamma spectrometry (GS) will be employed to create a data set for partitioning by a K-means cluster. The result of the cluster analysis is a delineation of three different parts. In contrast to previous studies, we evaluate the generated partitions by independent soil properties such as grain size, horizon thickness, and color of stratified randomly taken soil samples. The soil analyses show that one of three clusters significantly differs from the others in terms of grain-size distribution and horizon thickness. The partitioning of the other two clusters could not be confirmed by the considered soil parameters. Nevertheless, the case study demonstrates the combination of different PSS data by K-means clustering as a potential approach for site partitioning. An evaluation of the results of the cluster analysis through the collection and analysis of soil samples is highly recommended.
536 _ _ |a 246 - Modelling and Monitoring Terrestrial Systems: Methods and Technologies (POF2-246)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-246
|c POF2-246
|x 0
|f POF II
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Dietrich, Peter
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
773 _ _ |a 10.1002/jpln.201100262
|g Vol. 175, no. 3, p. 345 - 354
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1481142-x
|n 3
|p 345 - 354
|t Journal of plant nutrition and soil science
|v 175
|y 2012
|x 1436-8730
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/134439/files/FZJ-2013-02638.pdf
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:134439
|p VDB
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)136836
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
910 1 _ |k FZJ
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
910 1 _ |6 P:(DE-Juel1)136836
910 1 _ |b 0
913 2 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Marine, Küsten- und Polare Systeme
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-259H
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Addenda
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Erde und Umwelt
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-240
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-246
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200
|v Modelling and Monitoring Terrestrial Systems: Methods and Technologies
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF2
914 1 _ |y 2013
915 _ _ |a JCR/ISI refereed
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21