% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@BOOK{Ertinger:136075,
      author       = {Ertinger, Mathias},
      title        = {{N}ur das {G}eld zählt?: {E}rfassung von
                      {N}utzenorientierungen bei der {Z}uteilung von {G}eld und
                      materiellen {G}ütern},
      volume       = {2},
      issn         = {1433-5565},
      school       = {RWTH Aachen},
      type         = {Dr.},
      address      = {Jülich},
      publisher    = {Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Zentralbibliothek, Verlag},
      reportid     = {PreJuSER-136075},
      isbn         = {3-89336-336-X},
      series       = {Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich. Reihe Allgemeines
                      / general},
      pages        = {333 S.},
      year         = {2003},
      note         = {Record converted from JUWEL: 18.07.2013; RWTH Aachen,
                      Diss., 2002},
      abstract     = {Empirical studies show that people have different social
                      value orientations in decision-making situations. Some
                      people wish to maximize their own benefits (individualistic
                      social value orientation), whereas others make sure that the
                      benefits to all those involved are as great as possible
                      (cooperative social value orientation). With a view to the
                      long-standing debate on the consistency and stability of
                      this personality trait the study considers the extent to
                      which social value orientations change if different
                      resources are available in decision situations. The Ring
                      Measure of Social Values (RM) was used as the survey
                      instrument. The commonly applied RM consists of 24 decision
                      tasks in which a choice has to be made between different
                      sums of money. This was used together with three newly
                      designed RM variants in which a decision had to be made
                      between articles of clothing of different price, quality and
                      appearance. The four RM variants were presented to a sample
                      of 123 subjects. It became apparent that most of the test
                      persons reacted to the RM variants in a similar manner. The
                      generalizability of these findings is discussed against the
                      background of the composition of the sample group and the
                      resources used.},
      cin          = {P},
      ddc          = {330},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)P-20090406},
      shelfmark    = {YPD - Business economics / FZJ - Schriftenreihen des
                      Forschungszentrums Jülich / YPD - Betriebswirtschaft},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)3},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/136075},
}