% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Engelhardt:136943,
author = {Engelhardt, I. and Barth, J. A. C. and Bol, R. and Schulz,
M. and Ternes, A. and Schüth, C. and van Geldern, R.},
title = {{Q}uantification of long-term wastewater fluxes at the
surface water/groundwater-interface: {A}n integrative model
perspective using stable isotopes and acesulfame},
journal = {The science of the total environment},
volume = {466-467},
issn = {0048-9697},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2013-03465},
pages = {16 - 25},
year = {2014},
abstract = {The suitability of acesulfame to trace wastewater-related
surface water fluxes from streams into the hyporheic and
riparian zones over long-term periods was investigated. The
transport behavior of acesulfame was compared with the
transport of water stable isotopes (δ18O or δ2H). A
calibrated model based on a joint inversion of temperature,
acesulfame, and piezometric pressure heads was employed in a
model validation using data sets of acesulfame and water
stable isotopes collected over 5 months in a stream and
groundwater. The spatial distribution of fresh water within
the groundwater resulting from surface water infiltration
was estimated by computing groundwater ages and compared
with the predicted acesulfame plume obtained after 153 day
simulation time. Both, surface water ratios calculated with
a mixing equation from water stable isotopes and simulated
acesulfame mass fluxes, were investigated for their ability
to estimate the contribution of wastewater-related surface
water inflow within groundwater. The results of this study
point to limitations for the application of acesulfame to
trace surface water–groundwater interactions properly.
Acesulfame completely missed the wastewater-related surface
water volumes that still remained in the hyporheic zone
under stream-gaining conditions. In contrast, under
stream-losing conditions, which developed after periods of
stagnating hydraulic exchange, acesulfame based predictions
lead to an overestimation of the surface water volume of up
to $25\%$ in the riparian zone. If slow seepage velocities
prevail a proportion of acesulfame might be stored in
smaller pores, while when released under fast flowing water
conditions it will travel further downstream with the
groundwater flow direction. Therefore, under such conditions
acesulfame can be a less-ideal tracer in the hyporheic and
riparian zones and additional monitoring with other
environmental tracers such as water stable isotopes is
highly recommended.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {333.7},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {246 - Modelling and Monitoring Terrestrial Systems: Methods
and Technologies (POF2-246)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF2-246},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000330491600003},
doi = {10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.092},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/136943},
}