001     137891
005     20210129212128.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.008
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1873-2917
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0006-3207
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a WOS:000341473800005
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:2493097
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2013-04201
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 570
100 1 _ |a Hobbs, R.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Resilience in ecology: abstraction, distraction, or where the action is?
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2014
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1404891320_32146
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
520 _ _ |a Increasingly, the success of management interventions aimed at biodiversity conservation are viewed as being dependent on the ‘resilience’ of the system. Although the term ‘resilience’ is increasingly used by policy makers and environmental managers, the concept of ‘resilience’ remains vague, varied and difficult to quantify. Here we clarify what this concept means from an ecological perspective, and how it can be measured and applied to ecosystem management. We argue that thresholds of disturbance are central to measuring resilience. Thresholds are important because they offer a means to quantify how much disturbance an ecosystem can absorb before switching to another state, and so indicate whether intervention might be necessary to promote the recovery of the pre-disturbance state. We distinguish between helpful resilience, where resilience helps recovery, and unhelpful resilience where it does not, signalling the presence of a threshold and the need for intervention. Data to determine thresholds are not always available and so we consider the potential for indices of functional diversity to act as proxy measures of resilience. We also consider the contributions of connectivity and scale to resilience and how to incorporate these factors into management. We argue that linking thresholds to functional diversity indices may improve our ability to predict the resilience of ecosystems to future, potentially novel, disturbances according to their spatial and temporal scales of influence. Throughout, we provide guidance for the application of the resilience concept to ecosystem management. In doing so, we confirm its usefulness for improving biodiversity conservation in our rapidly changing world.
536 _ _ |a 242 - Sustainable Bioproduction (POF2-242)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-242
|c POF2-242
|f POF II
|x 0
536 _ _ |a 89582 - Plant Science (POF2-89582)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89582
|c POF2-89582
|f POF II T
|x 1
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Standish, R.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Bestelmeyer, B.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Mayfield, M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Suding, K.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Battaglia, L.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Eviner, V.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Hawkes, Ch.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Temperton, Vicky
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129409
|b 8
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Cramer, V.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Harris, J.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Funk, J.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Thomas, P.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 12
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.008
|g Vol. 177, p. 43 - 51
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1496231-7
|p 43-51
|t Biological conservation
|v 177
|y 2014
|x 1873-2917
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/137891/files/FZJ-2013-04201.pdf
|z Published final document.
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:137891
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129409
913 2 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Key Technologies for the Bioeconomy
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Plant Science
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Erde und Umwelt
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-240
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-242
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200
|v Sustainable Bioproduction
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF2
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89582
|v Plant Science
|x 1
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-890
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-800
|b Programmungebundene Forschung
|l ohne Programm
914 1 _ |y 2014
915 _ _ |a Peer review unknown
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0040
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1040
|2 StatID
|b Zoological Record
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
|k IBG-2
|l Pflanzenwissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21