% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Groo:13790,
      author       = {Grooß, J.-U. and Müller, R.},
      title        = {{D}o cosmic-ray-driven electron-induced reactions impact
                      stratospheric ozone depletion and global climate change?},
      journal      = {Atmospheric environment},
      volume       = {45},
      issn         = {1352-2310},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {PreJuSER-13790},
      pages        = {3508 - 3514},
      year         = {2011},
      note         = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
      abstract     = {Recently, the cosmic-ray-driven electron-induced reaction
                      mechanism (CRE) was introduced to explain polar ozone
                      depletion and surface temperature change. It was proposed
                      that the dissociation of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) on ice
                      surfaces of polar stratospheric clouds plays the dominant
                      role in forming the ozone hole. Efforts have been made to
                      predict polar ozone loss in future years. It was further
                      proposed that CFCs and cosmic-ray-driven ozone depletion may
                      control global surface temperatures. These assertions
                      challenge the fundamental understanding of Antarctic
                      stratospheric ozone loss and global warming. Here we show
                      that these arguments based on the CRE mechanism are
                      inconclusive. First, correlations of satellite data of
                      CFC-12, N2O and CH4 from ACE-FTS show no evidence of
                      significant loss of CFC-12 as predicted by the CRE
                      mechanism. Second, conclusions drawn about a possible CRE
                      impact on the atmosphere, based on correlations of different
                      observed atmospheric parameters, do not have a physical
                      basis. Finally, predictions on the future development of the
                      atmosphere based on these correlations are not reliable for
                      either the ozone hole or global surface temperatures. (C)
                      2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
      keywords     = {J (WoSType)},
      cin          = {IEK-7},
      ddc          = {550},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013},
      pnm          = {Atmosphäre und Klima},
      pid          = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK491},
      shelfmark    = {Environmental Sciences / Meteorology $\&$ Atmospheric
                      Sciences},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000292809300020},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.059},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/13790},
}