001     138605
005     20210129212309.0
024 7 _ |a 1095-8290
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0305-7364
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 10.1093/aob/mct220
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a WOS:000327717100016
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a 2128/5456
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:1861967
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:24163176
|2 pmid
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2013-04703
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 580
100 1 _ |a Giday, H.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Foliar abscisic acid content unterlies genotypic variation in stomatal responsiveness after growth at high relative air humidity
260 _ _ |a Oxford
|c 2013
|b Oxford University Press
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 138605
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
500 _ _ |3 POF3_Assignment on 2016-02-29
520 _ _ |a Background and Aims Stomata formed at high relative air humidity (RH) respond less to abscisic acid (ABA), an effect that varies widely between cultivars. This study tested the hypotheses that this genotypic variation in stomatal responsiveness originates from differential impairment in intermediates of the ABA signalling pathway during closure and differences in leaf ABA concentration during growth.Methods Stomatal anatomical features and stomatal responsiveness to desiccation, feeding with ABA, three transduction elements of its signalling pathway (H2O2, NO, Ca2+) and elicitors of these elements were determined in four rose cultivars grown at moderate (60 %) and high (90 %) RH. Leaf ABA concentration was assessed throughout the photoperiod and following mild desiccation (10 % leaf weight loss).Key Results Stomatal responsiveness to desiccation and ABA feeding was little affected by high RH in two cultivars, whereas it was considerably attenuated in two other cultivars (thus termed sensitive). Leaf ABA concentration was lower in plants grown at high RH, an effect that was more pronounced in the sensitive cultivars. Mild desiccation triggered an increase in leaf ABA concentration and equalized differences between leaves grown at moderate and high RH. High RH impaired stomatal responses to all transduction elements, but cultivar differences were not observed.ConclusionsHigh RH resulted in decreased leaf ABA concentration during growth as a result of lack of water deficit, since desiccation induced ABA accumulation. Sensitive cultivars underwent a larger decrease in leaf ABA concentration rather than having a higher ABA concentration threshold for inducing stomatal functioning. However, cultivar differences in stomatal closure following ABA feeding were not apparent in response to H2O2 and downstream elements, indicating that signalling events prior to H2O2 generation are involved in the observed genotypic variation.
536 _ _ |a 242 - Sustainable Bioproduction (POF2-242)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-242
|c POF2-242
|f POF II
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Fanourakis, Dimitrios
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)136919
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Kjaer, K. H.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Fomsgaard, I. S.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Ottosen, C.-O.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
773 _ _ |a 10.1093/aob/mct220
|g Vol. 112, no. 3, p. 479 - 501
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1461328-1
|n 9
|p 1857 - 1867
|t Annals of botany
|v 112
|y 2013
|x 1095-8290
856 4 _ |y Publishers version according to licensing conditions.
|z Published final document.
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/138605/files/FZJ-2013-04703.pdf
|y OpenAccess
|z Published final document.
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/138605/files/FZJ-2013-04703.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|x icon-1440
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/138605/files/FZJ-2013-04703.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|x icon-180
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/138605/files/FZJ-2013-04703.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|x icon-640
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:138605
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)136919
913 2 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Key Technologies for the Bioeconomy
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-589H
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Addenda
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Erde und Umwelt
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-240
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-242
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200
|v Sustainable Bioproduction
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF2
914 1 _ |y 2013
915 _ _ |a JCR/ISI refereed
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a Allianz-Lizenz / DFG
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0400
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
|k IBG-2
|l Pflanzenwissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21