% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Pons:138965,
author = {Pons, T. L. and Poorter, Hendrik},
title = {{T}he effect of irradiance on the carbon balance and tissue
characteristics of five herbaceous species differing in
shade-tolerance},
journal = {Frontiers in plant science},
volume = {5},
number = {12},
issn = {1664-462X},
address = {Lausanne},
publisher = {Frontiers Media},
reportid = {FZJ-2013-05007},
pages = {1 - 14},
year = {2014},
abstract = {The carbon balance is defined here as the partitioning of
daily whole-plant gross CO2 assimilation (A) in C available
for growth and C required for respiration (R). A scales
positively with growth irradiance and there is evidence for
an irradiance dependence of R as well. Here we ask if R as a
fraction of A is also irradiance dependent, whether there
are systematic differences in C-balance between
shade-tolerant and shade-intolerant species, and what the
causes could be. Growth, gas exchange, chemical composition
and leaf structure were analyzed for two shade-tolerant and
three shade-intolerant herbaceous species that were
hydroponically grown in a growth room at five irradiances
from 20 μmol m−2 s−1 (1.2 mol m−2 day−1) to 500
μmol m−2 s−1 (30 mol m−2 day−1). Growth analysis
showed little difference between species in unit leaf rate
(dry mass increase per unit leaf area) at low irradiance,
but lower rates for the shade-tolerant species at high
irradiance, mainly as a result of their lower
light-saturated rate of photosynthesis. This resulted in
lower relative growth rates in these conditions. Daily
whole-plant R scaled with A in a very tight manner, giving a
remarkably constant R/A ratio of around 0.3 for all but the
lowest irradiance. Although some shade-intolerant species
showed tendencies toward a higher R/A and inefficiencies in
terms of carbon and nitrogen investment in their leaves, no
conclusive evidence was found for systematic differences in
C-balance between the shade-tolerant and intolerant species
at the lowest irradiance. Leaf tissue of the shade-tolerant
species was characterized by high dry matter percentages,
C-concentration and construction costs, which could be
associated with a better defense in shade environments where
leaf longevity matters. We conclude that shade-intolerant
species have a competitive advantage at high irradiance due
to superior potential growth rates, but that shade-tolerance
is not necessarily associated with a better C-balance at low
irradiance. Under those conditions tolerance to other
stresses is probably more important for the performance of
shade-tolerant species.},
cin = {IBG-2},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {242 - Sustainable Bioproduction (POF2-242) / 89582 - Plant
Science (POF2-89582)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF2-242 / G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89582},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000331532600001},
pubmed = {pmid:24550922},
doi = {10.3389/fpls.2014.00012},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/138965},
}