001     138965
005     20210129212420.0
024 7 _ |a 10.3389/fpls.2014.00012
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/7815
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000331532600001
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:2096363
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:24550922
|2 pmid
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2013-05007
082 _ _ |a 570
100 1 _ |a Pons, T. L.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a The effect of irradiance on the carbon balance and tissue characteristics of five herbaceous species differing in shade-tolerance
260 _ _ |a Lausanne
|c 2014
|b Frontiers Media
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1403097890_30228
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
520 _ _ |a The carbon balance is defined here as the partitioning of daily whole-plant gross CO2 assimilation (A) in C available for growth and C required for respiration (R). A scales positively with growth irradiance and there is evidence for an irradiance dependence of R as well. Here we ask if R as a fraction of A is also irradiance dependent, whether there are systematic differences in C-balance between shade-tolerant and shade-intolerant species, and what the causes could be. Growth, gas exchange, chemical composition and leaf structure were analyzed for two shade-tolerant and three shade-intolerant herbaceous species that were hydroponically grown in a growth room at five irradiances from 20 μmol m−2 s−1 (1.2 mol m−2 day−1) to 500 μmol m−2 s−1 (30 mol m−2 day−1). Growth analysis showed little difference between species in unit leaf rate (dry mass increase per unit leaf area) at low irradiance, but lower rates for the shade-tolerant species at high irradiance, mainly as a result of their lower light-saturated rate of photosynthesis. This resulted in lower relative growth rates in these conditions. Daily whole-plant R scaled with A in a very tight manner, giving a remarkably constant R/A ratio of around 0.3 for all but the lowest irradiance. Although some shade-intolerant species showed tendencies toward a higher R/A and inefficiencies in terms of carbon and nitrogen investment in their leaves, no conclusive evidence was found for systematic differences in C-balance between the shade-tolerant and intolerant species at the lowest irradiance. Leaf tissue of the shade-tolerant species was characterized by high dry matter percentages, C-concentration and construction costs, which could be associated with a better defense in shade environments where leaf longevity matters. We conclude that shade-intolerant species have a competitive advantage at high irradiance due to superior potential growth rates, but that shade-tolerance is not necessarily associated with a better C-balance at low irradiance. Under those conditions tolerance to other stresses is probably more important for the performance of shade-tolerant species.
536 _ _ |a 242 - Sustainable Bioproduction (POF2-242)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-242
|c POF2-242
|f POF II
|x 0
536 _ _ |a 89582 - Plant Science (POF2-89582)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89582
|c POF2-89582
|f POF II T
|x 1
700 1 _ |a Poorter, Hendrik
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129384
|b 1
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.3389/fpls.2014.00012
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2613694-6
|n 12
|p 1 - 14
|t Frontiers in plant science
|v 5
|y 2014
|x 1664-462X
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/138965/files/FZJ-2013-05007.pdf
|y OpenAccess
|z Published final document.
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/138965/files/FZJ-2013-05007.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|x icon-1440
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/138965/files/FZJ-2013-05007.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|x icon-180
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/138965/files/FZJ-2013-05007.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|x icon-640
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:138965
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129384
913 2 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Key Technologies for the Bioeconomy
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Plant Science
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Erde und Umwelt
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-240
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-242
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200
|v Sustainable Bioproduction
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF2
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89582
|v Plant Science
|x 1
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-890
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-800
|b Programmungebundene Forschung
|l ohne Programm
914 1 _ |y 2014
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY3
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a Peer review unknown
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0040
|2 StatID
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
|k IBG-2
|l Pflanzenwissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a FullTexts
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21