% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Sutmann:141830,
author = {Sutmann, Godehard and Arnold, Axel and Fahrenberger,
Florian and Holm, Christian and Bolten, Matthias and
Dachsel, Holger and Halver, Rene and Kabadshow, Ivo and
Gaehler, Franz and Heber, Frederik and Iseringhausen, Julian
and Hofmann, Michael and Pippig, Michael and Potts, Daniel},
title = {{C}omparison of scalable fast methods for long-range
interactions},
journal = {Physical review / E},
volume = {88},
number = {6},
issn = {1539-3755},
address = {College Park, Md.},
publisher = {APS},
reportid = {FZJ-2014-00170},
pages = {063308},
year = {2013},
abstract = {Based on a parallel scalable library for Coulomb
interactions in particle systems, a comparison between the
fast multipole method (FMM), multigrid-based methods, fast
Fourier transform (FFT)-based methods, and a Maxwell solver
is provided for the case of three-dimensional periodic
boundary conditions. These methods are directly compared
with respect to complexity, scalability, performance, and
accuracy. To ensure comparable conditions for all methods
and to cover typical applications, we tested all methods on
the same set of computers using identical benchmark systems.
Our findings suggest that, depending on system size and
desired accuracy, the FMM- and FFT-based methods are most
efficient in performance and stability.},
cin = {JSC},
ddc = {530},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406},
pnm = {411 - Computational Science and Mathematical Methods
(POF2-411) / FMM - Fast Multipole Method (FMM-20140729)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF2-411 / G:(DE-Juel1)FMM-20140729},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000328697900008},
doi = {10.1103/PhysRevE.88.063308},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/141830},
}