% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Bohn:1445,
author = {Bohn, B. and Corlett, G.K. and Gillmann, M. and Sanghavi,
S. and Stange, G. and Tensing, E. and Vrekoussis, M. and
Bloss, W. J. and Clapp, L.J. and Kortner, M. and Dorn, H.-P.
and Monks, P. S. and Platt, U. and Plass-Dülmer, C. and
Mihalopoulos, N. and Heard, D. E. and Clemitshaw, K. C. and
Meixner, F. X. and Prevot, A. S. H. and Schmitt, R.},
title = {{P}hotolysis frequency measurement techniques: results of a
comparison within the {ACCENT} project},
journal = {Atmospheric chemistry and physics},
volume = {8},
issn = {1680-7316},
address = {Katlenburg-Lindau},
publisher = {EGU},
reportid = {PreJuSER-1445},
pages = {5373 - 5391},
year = {2008},
note = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
abstract = {An intercomparison of different radiometric techniques
measuring atmospheric photolysis frequencies j(NO2), j(HCHO)
and j((OD)-D-1) was carried out in a two-week field campaign
in June 2005 at Julich. Germany. Three double-monochromator
based spectroradiometers (DM-SR), three single-monochromator
based spectroradiometers with diode-array detectors (SM-SR)
and seventeen filter radiometers (FR) (ten j(NO2))-FR, seven
j((OD)-D-1)-FR) took part in this comparison. For j(NO2),
all spectroradiometer results agreed within +/- $3\%.$ For
j(HCHO), agreement was slightly poorer between $-8\%$ and
$+4\%$ of the DM-SR reference result. For the SM-SR
deviations were explained by poorer spectral resolutions and
lower accuracies caused by decreased sensitivities of the
photodiode arrays in a wave-length range below 350 nm. For
j((OD)-D-1), the results were more complex within $+8\%$ and
$-4\%$ with increasing deviations towards larger solar
zenith angles for the SM-SR. The direction and the magnitude
of the deviations were dependent on the technique of
background determination. All j(NO2))-FR showed good
linearity with sing-le calibration factors being sufficient
to convert from output voltages to j(NO2)). Measurements
were feasible until sunset and comparison with previous
calibrations showed good long-term stability. For the
j((OD)-D-1)-FR, conversion from output voltages to
j((OD)-D-1) needed calibration factors and correction
functions considering the influences of total ozone column
and elevation of the sun. All instruments showed good
linearity at photolysis frequencies exceeding about $10\%$
of maximum values. At larger solar zenith angles, the
agreement was non-uniform with deviations explainable by
insufficient correction functions. Comparison with previous
calibrations for sonic J((OD)-D-1)-FR indicated drifts of
calibration factors.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {ICG-2},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB791},
pnm = {Atmosphäre und Klima},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK406},
shelfmark = {Meteorology $\&$ Atmospheric Sciences},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000259221400020},
doi = {10.5194/acp-8-5373-2008},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1445},
}