% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Vanderborght:14524,
      author       = {Vanderborght, J. and Tiktak, A. and Boesten, J.J.T.I. and
                      Vereecken, H.},
      title        = {{E}ffect of pesticide fate parameters and their uncertainty
                      on the selection of worst-casescenarios of pesticide
                      leaching to groundwater},
      journal      = {Pest management science},
      volume       = {67},
      issn         = {1526-498X},
      address      = {New York, NY},
      publisher    = {Wiley Interscience},
      reportid     = {PreJuSER-14524},
      pages        = {294 - 306},
      year         = {2011},
      note         = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
      abstract     = {For the registration of pesticides in the European Union,
                      model simulations for worst-case scenarios are used to
                      demonstrate that leaching concentrations to groundwater do
                      not exceed a critical threshold. A worst-case scenario is a
                      combination of soil and climate properties for which
                      predicted leaching concentrations are higher than a certain
                      percentile of the spatial concentration distribution within
                      a region. The derivation of scenarios is complicated by
                      uncertainty about soil and pesticide fate parameters. As the
                      ranking of climate and soil property combinations according
                      to predicted leaching concentrations is different for
                      different pesticides, the worst-case scenario for one
                      pesticide may misrepresent the worst case for another
                      pesticide, which leads to 'scenario uncertainty'.Pesticide
                      fate parameter uncertainty led to higher concentrations in
                      the higher percentiles of spatial concentration
                      distributions, especially for distributions in smaller and
                      more homogeneous regions. The effect of pesticide fate
                      parameter uncertainty on the spatial concentration
                      distribution was small when compared with the uncertainty of
                      local concentration predictions and with the scenario
                      uncertainty.Uncertainty in pesticide fate parameters and
                      scenario uncertainty can be accounted for using higher
                      percentiles of spatial concentration distributions and
                      considering a range of pesticides for the scenario
                      selection.},
      keywords     = {Climate / Computer Simulation / Environmental Monitoring /
                      European Union / Pesticides: analysis / Pesticides:
                      chemistry / Risk Assessment / Soil Pollutants: analysis /
                      Soil Pollutants: chemistry / Uncertainty / Water Pollutants,
                      Chemical: analysis / Water Pollutants, Chemical: chemistry /
                      Pesticides (NLM Chemicals) / Soil Pollutants (NLM Chemicals)
                      / Water Pollutants, Chemical (NLM Chemicals) / J (WoSType)},
      cin          = {IBG-3},
      ddc          = {660},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
      pnm          = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
      pid          = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
      shelfmark    = {Agronomy / Entomology},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:21308955},
      UT           = {WOS:000287680000007},
      doi          = {10.1002/ps.2066},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/14524},
}