% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Montzka:14642,
author = {Montzka, C. and Moradkhani, H. and Weihermüller, L. and
Hendricks Franssen, H.-J. and Canty, M. and Vereecken, H.},
title = {{H}ydraulic parameter estimation by remotely-sensed top
soil moisture observations with the particle filter},
journal = {Journal of hydrology},
volume = {399},
issn = {0022-1694},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {PreJuSER-14642},
year = {2011},
note = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
abstract = {In a synthetic study we explore the potential of using
surface soil moisture measurements obtained from different
satellite platforms to retrieve soil moisture profiles and
soil hydraulic properties using a sequential data
assimilation procedure and a 1D mechanistic soil water
model. Four different homogeneous soil types were
investigated including loamy sand, loam, silt, and clayey
soils. The forcing data including precipitation and
potential evapotranspiration were taken from the
meteorological station of Aachen (Germany). With the aid of
the forward model run, a synthetic data set was designed and
observations were generated. The virtual top soil moisture
observations were then assimilated to update the states and
hydraulic parameters of the model by means of a particle
filtering data assimilation method. Our analyses include the
effect of assimilation strategy, measurement frequency,
accuracy in surface soil moisture measurements, and soils
differing in textural and hydraulic properties.With this
approach we were able to assess the value of periodic
spaceborne observations of top soil moisture for soil
moisture profile estimation and identify the adequate
conditions (e.g. temporal resolution and measurement
accuracy) for remotely sensed soil moisture data
assimilation. Updating of both hydraulic parameters and
state variables allowed better predictions of top soil
moisture contents as compared with updating of states only.
An important conclusion is that the assimilation of
remotely-sensed top soil moisture for soil hydraulic
parameter estimation generates a bias depending on the soil
type. Results indicate that the ability of a data
assimilation system to correct the soil moisture state and
estimate hydraulic parameters is driven by the non linearity
between soil moisture and pressure head. (c) 2011 Elsevier
B.V. All tights reserved.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {690},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Engineering, Civil / Geosciences, Multidisciplinary / Water
Resources},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000288828500024},
doi = {10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.020},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/14642},
}