000150615 001__ 150615
000150615 005__ 20210129213235.0
000150615 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1080/17470919.2014.886618
000150615 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000334067000011
000150615 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:2115865
000150615 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:24512520
000150615 037__ $$aFZJ-2014-00664
000150615 082__ $$a610
000150615 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)144165$$aKuzmanovic, Bojana$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000150615 245__ $$aDissociating animacy processing in high-functioning autism: neural correlates of stimulus properties and subjective ratings.
000150615 260__ $$aNew York [u.a.]$$bPsychology Press$$c2014
000150615 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1397551021_17875
000150615 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000150615 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000150615 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000150615 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000150615 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000150615 520__ $$aWhen movements indicate meaningful actions, even nonbiological objects induce the impression of “having a mind” or animacy. This basic social ability was investigated in adults with high-functioning autism (HFA, n = 13, and matched controls, n = 13) by systematically varying motion properties of simple geometric shapes. Critically, trial-by-trial variations of (1) motion complexity of stimuli, and of (2) participants’ individual animacy ratings were separately correlated with neural activity to dissociate cognitive strategies relying more closely on stimulus analysis vs. subjective experience. Increasing motion complexity did not yield any significant group differences, and in both groups, it correlated with neural activity in regions involved in perceptual and evaluative processing, including the ventral medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), superior temporal gyrus (STG) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC). In contrast, although there were no significant behavioral differences between the groups, increasing animacy ratings correlated with neural activity in the insula, STG, amygdala, dorsal mPFC and PCC more strongly in controls than in HFA. These results indicate that in HFA the evaluation of stimulus properties cuing for animacy is intact, while increasing subjective ratings do not seem to be robustly related to social processing, including spontaneous mental state inferences and experience of salience
000150615 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-333$$a333 - Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Neurological and Psychiatric Diseases (POF2-333)$$cPOF2-333$$fPOF II$$x0
000150615 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89572$$a89572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF2-89572)$$cPOF2-89572$$fPOF II T$$x1
000150615 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchilbach, L.$$b1
000150615 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)144166$$aGeorgescu, A. L.$$b2$$ufzj
000150615 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKockler, H.$$b3
000150615 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSantos, N. S.$$b4
000150615 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131794$$aShah, N. J.$$b5$$ufzj
000150615 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBente, G.$$b6
000150615 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131720$$aFink, G. R.$$b7$$ufzj
000150615 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145756$$aVogeley, K.$$b8$$ufzj
000150615 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2234411-1$$a10.1080/17470919.2014.886618$$n3$$p309-325$$tSocial neuroscience$$v9$$x1747-0927$$y2014
000150615 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:150615$$pVDB
000150615 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)144165$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b0$$kFZJ
000150615 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)144166$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b2$$kFZJ
000150615 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131794$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b5$$kFZJ
000150615 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131720$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b7$$kFZJ
000150615 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)145756$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b8$$kFZJ
000150615 9141_ $$y2014
000150615 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$2StatID$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000150615 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR
000150615 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000150615 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000150615 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000150615 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000150615 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000150615 9132_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$v(Dys-)function and Plasticity$$x0
000150615 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-333$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF2-330$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF2-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF2$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lFunktion und Dysfunktion des Nervensystems$$vPathophysiological Mechanisms of Neurological and Psychiatric Diseases$$x0
000150615 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89572$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-890$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-800$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bProgrammungebundene Forschung$$lohne Programm$$v(Dys-)function and Plasticity$$x1
000150615 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406$$kINM-3$$lKognitive Neurowissenschaften$$x0
000150615 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406$$kINM-4$$lPhysik der Medizinischen Bildgebung$$x1
000150615 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-8-20090406$$kINM-8$$lEthik in den Neurowissenschaften$$x2
000150615 980__ $$ajournal
000150615 980__ $$aVDB
000150615 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
000150615 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406
000150615 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-8-20090406
000150615 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000150615 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406
000150615 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-8-20090406