% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Kuzmanovic:150615,
      author       = {Kuzmanovic, Bojana and Schilbach, L. and Georgescu, A. L.
                      and Kockler, H. and Santos, N. S. and Shah, N. J. and Bente,
                      G. and Fink, G. R. and Vogeley, K.},
      title        = {{D}issociating animacy processing in high-functioning
                      autism: neural correlates of stimulus properties and
                      subjective ratings.},
      journal      = {Social neuroscience},
      volume       = {9},
      number       = {3},
      issn         = {1747-0927},
      address      = {New York [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Psychology Press},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2014-00664},
      pages        = {309-325},
      year         = {2014},
      abstract     = {When movements indicate meaningful actions, even
                      nonbiological objects induce the impression of “having a
                      mind” or animacy. This basic social ability was
                      investigated in adults with high-functioning autism (HFA, n
                      = 13, and matched controls, n = 13) by systematically
                      varying motion properties of simple geometric shapes.
                      Critically, trial-by-trial variations of (1) motion
                      complexity of stimuli, and of (2) participants’ individual
                      animacy ratings were separately correlated with neural
                      activity to dissociate cognitive strategies relying more
                      closely on stimulus analysis vs. subjective experience.
                      Increasing motion complexity did not yield any significant
                      group differences, and in both groups, it correlated with
                      neural activity in regions involved in perceptual and
                      evaluative processing, including the ventral medial
                      prefrontal cortex (mPFC), superior temporal gyrus (STG) and
                      posterior cingulate cortex (PCC). In contrast, although
                      there were no significant behavioral differences between the
                      groups, increasing animacy ratings correlated with neural
                      activity in the insula, STG, amygdala, dorsal mPFC and PCC
                      more strongly in controls than in HFA. These results
                      indicate that in HFA the evaluation of stimulus properties
                      cuing for animacy is intact, while increasing subjective
                      ratings do not seem to be robustly related to social
                      processing, including spontaneous mental state inferences
                      and experience of salience},
      cin          = {INM-3 / INM-4 / INM-8},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406 /
                      I:(DE-Juel1)INM-8-20090406},
      pnm          = {333 - Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Neurological and
                      Psychiatric Diseases (POF2-333) / 89572 - (Dys-)function and
                      Plasticity (POF2-89572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF2-333 / G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000334067000011},
      pubmed       = {pmid:24512520},
      doi          = {10.1080/17470919.2014.886618},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/150615},
}