000151431 001__ 151431
000151431 005__ 20220930130027.0
000151431 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.026
000151431 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1879-2707
000151431 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0022-1694
000151431 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000339036100022
000151431 037__ $$aFZJ-2014-01379
000151431 082__ $$a690
000151431 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)144513$$aBaatz, R.$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000151431 245__ $$aCalibration of a catchment scale cosmic-ray probe network: A comparison of three parameterization methods
000151431 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier$$c2014
000151431 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1405343782_22671
000151431 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000151431 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000151431 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000151431 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000151431 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000151431 520__ $$aThe objective of this work was to assess the accuracy of soil water content determination from neutron flux measured by cosmic-ray probes under humid climate conditions. Ten cosmic-ray probes were set up in the Rur catchment located in western Germany, and calibrated by gravimetric soil sampling campaigns. Aboveground biomass was estimated at the sites to investigate the role of vegetation cover on the neutron flux and the calibration procedure. Three parameterization methods were used to generate site-specific neutron flux - soil water content calibration curves: i) the N0-method, ii) the hydrogen molar fraction method (hmf-method), and iii) the COSMIC-method. At five locations, calibration measurements were repeated to evaluate site-specific calibration parameters obtained in two different sampling campaigns. At two locations, soil water content determined by cosmic-ray probes was evaluated with horizontally and vertically weighted soil water content measurements of two distributed in-situ soil water content sensor networks. All three methods were successfully calibrated to determine field scale soil water content continuously at the ten sites. The hmf-method and the COSMIC-method had more similar calibration curves than the N0-method. The three methods performed similarly well in the validation and errors were within the uncertainty of neutron flux measurements despite observed differences in the calibration curves and variable model complexity. In addition, we found that the obtained calibration parameters NCOSMIC, N0 and NS showed a strong correlation with aboveground biomass.
000151431 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-246$$a246 - Modelling and Monitoring Terrestrial Systems: Methods and Technologies (POF2-246)$$cPOF2-246$$fPOF II$$x0
000151431 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x1
000151431 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, juser.fz-juelich.de
000151431 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129440$$aBogena, Heye$$b1$$ufzj
000151431 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHendricks Franssen, H.-J.$$b2
000151431 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129472$$aHuisman, J. A.$$b3$$ufzj
000151431 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)142576$$aQu, W.$$b4$$ufzj
000151431 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129506$$aMontzka, C.$$b5$$ufzj
000151431 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aVereecken, H.$$b6$$ufzj
000151431 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1473173-3$$a10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.026$$gp. S0022169414001346$$p231–244$$tJournal of hydrology$$v516$$x0022-1694$$y2014
000151431 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/151431/files/FZJ-2014-01379.pdf$$yRestricted$$zPublished final document.
000151431 8767_ $$92014-03-04$$d2014-04-02$$eColour charges$$jZahlung erfolgt
000151431 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:151431$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pVDB$$pOpenAPC$$popenCost
000151431 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)144513$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b0$$kFZJ
000151431 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129440$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b1$$kFZJ
000151431 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129472$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b3$$kFZJ
000151431 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)142576$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b4$$kFZJ
000151431 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129506$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b5$$kFZJ
000151431 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b6$$kFZJ
000151431 9132_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$aDE-HGF$$bMarine, Küsten- und Polare Systeme$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000151431 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-246$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF2-240$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF2$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vModelling and Monitoring Terrestrial Systems: Methods and Technologies$$x0
000151431 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x1
000151431 9141_ $$y2014
000151431 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$2StatID$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000151431 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR
000151431 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000151431 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000151431 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000151431 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000151431 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000151431 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000151431 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000151431 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000151431 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
000151431 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000151431 980__ $$ajournal
000151431 980__ $$aVDB
000151431 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000151431 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000151431 980__ $$aAPC