000151782 001__ 151782
000151782 005__ 20210129213546.0
000151782 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00130
000151782 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/5951
000151782 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000331286000001
000151782 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:2124903
000151782 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:24596567
000151782 037__ $$aFZJ-2014-01664
000151782 082__ $$a150
000151782 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)144814$$aJefferson, Anneli$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000151782 245__ $$aMental disorders, brain disorders and values
000151782 260__ $$aLausanne$$bFrontiers Research Foundation$$c2014
000151782 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s151782
000151782 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000151782 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000151782 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000151782 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000151782 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000151782 500__ $$3POF3_Assignment on 2016-02-29
000151782 520__ $$aThe debates about the normativity of mental disorders and about the distinction between somatic and mental disorders have long been closely linked. This is very obvious in Szasz, who claims that there can only be brain disorders, no mental disorders and that so-called mental disorders are really problems in living. The implication of the latter claim is that people who have mental disorders are really people whose behavior and emotions depart from societal expectations. One might therefore be tempted to think that the normativity claim and the claim that mental disorders are really brain disorders stand and fall together. This is indeed what Stier claims. “Because of the normative nature of psychiatry, mental disorders cannot be completely reduced to neuronal or molecular processes.” (Stier, 2013, p.8)But how close is the link between normativity and irreducibility really? I agree with Stier that ascriptions of mental disorders are intrinsically normative, and that what counts as a mental disorder has to be decided at the mental rather than at the brain level is also correct. However, the normativity claim and the claim that physicalism does not imply that all mental disorders are brain disorders can and should be separated for two reasons: First, we do not need the appeal to value judgments to justify the importance of the mental level in description and explanation. Second, we need to invest significant normative judgments in any kind of ascription of disease or disorder, not just in the range of the mental. ...
000151782 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-472$$a472 - Key Technologies and Innovation Processes (POF2-472)$$cPOF2-472$$fPOF II$$x0
000151782 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, juser.fz-juelich.de
000151782 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2563826-9$$a10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00130$$gVol. 5$$p130$$tFrontiers in psychology$$v5$$x1664-1078$$y2014
000151782 8564_ $$yPublishers version according to licensing conditions.$$zPublished final document.
000151782 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/151782/files/FZJ-2014-01664.pdf$$yOpenAccess$$zPublished final document.
000151782 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/151782/files/FZJ-2014-01664.jpg?subformat=icon-144$$xicon-144$$yOpenAccess
000151782 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/151782/files/FZJ-2014-01664.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yOpenAccess
000151782 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/151782/files/FZJ-2014-01664.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yOpenAccess
000151782 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:151782$$pdnbdelivery$$pVDB$$pdriver$$popen_access$$popenaire
000151782 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)144814$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b0$$kFZJ
000151782 9132_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-579H$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$vAddenda$$x0
000151782 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-472$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF2-470$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF2-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF2$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bEnergie$$lTechnologie, Innovation und Gesellschaft$$vKey Technologies and Innovation Processes$$x0
000151782 9141_ $$y2014
000151782 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY3$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0
000151782 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000151782 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000151782 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0040$$2StatID$$aPeer review unknown
000151782 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ
000151782 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-8-20090406$$kINM-8$$lEthik in den Neurowissenschaften$$x0
000151782 980__ $$ajournal
000151782 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000151782 980__ $$aJUWEL
000151782 980__ $$aFullTexts
000151782 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-8-20090406
000151782 980__ $$aVDB
000151782 9801_ $$aFullTexts